Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
- PMID: 22711081
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00424
Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
Erratum in
- Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jun 4;158(11):852. Ebell, Mark [added]
Abstract
Description: Update of the 2003 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation statement on screening for cervical cancer.
Methods: The USPSTF reviewed new evidence on the comparative test performance of liquid-based cytology and the benefits and harms of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as a stand-alone test or in combination with cytology. In addition to the systematic evidence review, the USPSTF commissioned a decision analysis to help clarify the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, and the relative benefits and harms of different strategies for screening (such as cytology and co-testing).
Recommendations: This recommendation statement applies to women who have a cervix, regardless of sexual history. This recommendation statement does not apply to women who have received a diagnosis of a high-grade precancerous cervical lesion or cervical cancer, women with in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol, or women who are immunocompromised (such as those who are HIV positive).The USPSTF recommends screening for cervical cancer in women aged 21 to 65 years with cytology (Papanicolaou smear) every 3 years or, for women aged 30 to 65 years who want to lengthen the screening interval, screening with a combination of cytology and HPV testing every 5 years. See the Clinical Considerations for discussion of cytology method, HPV testing, and screening interval (A recommendation).The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women younger than age 21 years (D recommendation).The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women older than age 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and are not otherwise at high risk for cervical cancer. See the Clinical Considerations for discussion of adequacy of prior screening and risk factors (D recommendation).The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix and who do not have a history of a high-grade precancerous lesion (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3) or cervical cancer (D recommendation).The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer with HPV testing, alone or in combination with cytology, in women younger than age 30 years (D recommendation).
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jun 19;156(12):I-44. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00003. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22711102 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):674-686. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10897. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 30140884
-
Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):716-26, W-236. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00008. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19920272
-
Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22801674
-
Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 May. Report No.: 11-05157-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 May. Report No.: 11-05157-EF-1. PMID: 22553886 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Barriers to cervical cancer screening among immigrants.JAAPA. 2022 Mar 1;35(3):23-27. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000819564.35151.0a. JAAPA. 2022. PMID: 35120364 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk factors related to recurrence after surgical excision procedure for cervical dysplasia.Hippokratia. 2023 Oct-Dec;27(4):132-140. Hippokratia. 2023. PMID: 39372323 Free PMC article.
-
A Community-Based Cervical Cancer Education and Navigation Program for Korean American Women.Asian Am J Psychol. 2024 Sep;15(3):196-204. doi: 10.1037/aap0000324. Asian Am J Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39371220
-
Associations of demographic, health, and risk-taking behaviors with tattooing in a population-based cross-sectional study of ~18,000 US adults.Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Aug 28:rs.3.rs-4838597. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4838597/v1. Res Sq. 2024. PMID: 39257981 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
The role of endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in human papillomavirus positive patients.Ann Saudi Med. 2024 Jul-Aug;44(4):220-227. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2024.220. Epub 2024 Aug 1. Ann Saudi Med. 2024. PMID: 39127897 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of Cervical Cancer Screening among Female Health Professionals in Harar Town, Eastern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jun 8;2024:1430978. doi: 10.1155/2024/1430978. eCollection 2024. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38887703 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical