Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;130(1):139-49.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3705. Epub 2012 Jun 18.

Feasibility of evaluating the CHIPRA care quality measures in electronic health record data

Affiliations

Feasibility of evaluating the CHIPRA care quality measures in electronic health record data

Rachel Gold et al. Pediatrics. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

The Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) includes provisions for identifying standardized pediatric care quality measures. These 24 "CHIPRA measures" were designed to be evaluated by using claims data from health insurance plan populations. Such data have limited ability to evaluate population health, especially among uninsured people. The rapid expansion of data from electronic health records (EHRs) may help address this limitation by augmenting claims data in care quality assessments. We outline how to operationalize many of the CHIPRA measures for application in EHR data through a case study of a network of >40 outpatient community health centers in 2009-2010 with a single EHR. We assess the differences seen when applying the original claims-based versus adapted EHR-based specifications, using 2 CHIPRA measures (Chlamydia screening among sexually active female patients; BMI percentile documentation) as examples. Sixteen of the original CHIPRA measures could feasibly be evaluated in this dataset. Three main adaptations were necessary (specifying a visit-based population denominator, calculating some pregnancy-related factors by using EHR data, substituting for medication dispense data). Although it is feasible to adapt many of the CHIPRA measures for use in outpatient EHR data, information is gained and lost depending on how numerators and denominators are specified. We suggest first steps toward application of the CHIPRA measures in uninsured populations, and in EHR data. The results highlight the importance of considering the limitations of the original CHIPRA measures in care quality evaluations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Females aged 16 to 24 identified as sexually active in 2009, as identified by the original and adapted measure definitions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009. Pub L No. 111–3. 123 Stat 8. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/HealthInsReformforConsume/Downloads/CHIPRA.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2011
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services Medicaid and CHIP programs: initial core set of children's healthcare quality measures for voluntary use by Medicaid and CHIP programs. Fed Regist. 2009;74:68846–68849
    1. Mangione-Smith R, Schiff J, Dougherty D. Identifying children’s health care quality measures for Medicaid and CHIP: an evidence-informed, publicly transparent expert process. Acad Pediatr. 2011;11(suppl 3):S11–S21 - PubMed
    1. Dougherty D, Schiff J, Mangione-Smith R. The Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act quality measures initiatives: moving forward to improve measurement, care, and child and adolescent outcomes. Acad Pediatr. 2011;11(suppl 3):S1–S10 - PubMed
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Initial Core Set of Children's Healthcare Quality Measures. 2009. Available at: http//www.ahrq.gov/chip/listtable.htm. Accessed December 6, 2011

Publication types

MeSH terms