Development and validation of comorbidity index in South Korea
- PMID: 22718515
- DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs027
Development and validation of comorbidity index in South Korea
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a new comorbidity index using data from hospitalized patients in South Korea.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Hospital inpatients.
Study participants: Data from 4677 hospitalized patients aged 40-79 who had admitted in a medical center in Korea between September and December in 1997 were individually linked to national mortality data through December 2007. Among them, 3274 patients (70%) were randomly included in the development data set and the other 1403 patients (30%) in the validation data set. Another 3413 liver cancer patients from the same hospital were used to validate the index.
Main measure: Comorbidity index and mortality risk.
Results: Based on mortality using stratified Cox regression analyses, comorbidity scores ranging from 1 to 4 were assigned for 20 comorbid conditions. Summation of the scores produced the new comorbidity index (Asan comorbidity index, ACI). C-indices in the Cox regression analyses showed the greatest increase [0.589 (95% confidence interval, 0.568-0.609) in age- and sex-adjusted model; 0.697 (0.678-0.716) in the ACI and 0.664 (0.645-0.684) in the Charlson comorbidity index, respectively] when the ACI was added in the validation models.
Conclusions: A newly developed comorbidity index using Korean hospitalized patient data based on the International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision (ICD-10) was valid among both general medical inpatients and liver cancer patients. This index may well be widely used in various health-care settings in Korea where patients' information on health conditions is coded with ICD-10.
Similar articles
-
Development of an epilepsy-specific risk adjustment comorbidity index.Epilepsia. 2011 Dec;52(12):2161-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03292.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17. Epilepsia. 2011. PMID: 22004000
-
The Best Use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index With Electronic Health Care Database to Predict Mortality.Med Care. 2016 Feb;54(2):188-94. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000471. Med Care. 2016. PMID: 26683778
-
Charlson scores based on ICD-10 administrative data were valid in assessing comorbidity in patients undergoing urological cancer surgery.J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):265-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.015. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16488357
-
Prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcoma.Dan Med J. 2014 Nov;61(11):B4957. Dan Med J. 2014. PMID: 25370967 Review.
-
A systematic review of the Charlson comorbidity index using Canadian administrative databases: a perspective on risk adjustment in critical care research.J Crit Care. 2005 Mar;20(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.09.007. J Crit Care. 2005. PMID: 16015512 Review.
Cited by
-
The Relationship between Hospital Selection by Employer and Disabilities in Occupational Accidents in Korea.Saf Health Work. 2022 Sep;13(3):279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2022.03.011. Epub 2022 Apr 11. Saf Health Work. 2022. PMID: 36156864 Free PMC article.
-
Validation and adaptation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index using administrative data from the Colombian health system: retrospective cohort study.BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 23;12(3):e054058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054058. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35321892 Free PMC article.
-
Charlson comorbidity index is an important prognostic factor for long-term survival outcomes in Korean men with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.Yonsei Med J. 2014 Mar;55(2):316-23. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.2.316. Yonsei Med J. 2014. PMID: 24532498 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
