Association of insurance status and age with cervical cancer stage at diagnosis: National Cancer Database, 2000-2007
- PMID: 22742058
- PMCID: PMC3482026
- DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300532
Association of insurance status and age with cervical cancer stage at diagnosis: National Cancer Database, 2000-2007
Abstract
Objectives: We examined the relationship of age at diagnosis and insurance status with stage among cervical cancer patients aged 21 to 85 years.
Methods: We selected data on women (n = 69 739) diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer between 2000 and 2007 from the National Cancer Database. We evaluated the association between late stage (stage III/IV) and both insurance and age, with adjustment for race/ethnicity and other sociodemographic and clinical factors. We used multivariable log binomial models to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: The proportion of late-stage disease increased with age: from 16.53% (21-34 years) to 42.44% (≥ 70 years). The adjusted relative risk of advanced-stage disease among women aged 50 years and older was 2.2 to 2.5 times that of patients aged 21 to 34 years. Uninsured (RR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.40, 1.49), Medicaid (RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.34, 1.41), younger Medicare (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.19), and older Medicare (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.26) patients had a higher risk of late-stage disease than did privately insured patients.
Conclusions: Screening should be encouraged for women at high risk for advanced-stage disease.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The association of insurance and stage at diagnosis among patients aged 55 to 74 years in the national cancer database.Cancer J. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):614-21. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181ff2aec. Cancer J. 2010. PMID: 21131794
-
Disparities in stage at diagnosis among adults with testicular germ cell tumors in the National Cancer Data Base.Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):23.e15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.08.012. Epub 2013 Feb 8. Urol Oncol. 2014. PMID: 23395701
-
Disparities in the management and outcome of cervical cancer in the United States according to health insurance status.Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jun;141(3):516-523. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.025. Epub 2016 Mar 25. Gynecol Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27012428 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Delays in Surgery for Melanoma With Insurance Type.JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Nov 1;153(11):1106-1113. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3338. JAMA Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28979974 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer stage variation and survival in association with insurance status and sociodemographic factors in US women 18 to 64 years old.Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;123(16):3125-3131. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30722. Epub 2017 Apr 25. Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28440864
Cited by
-
Perspectives of primary care providers regarding multicancer early detection panels.Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Aug 23;22:eAO0771. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0771. eCollection 2024. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024. PMID: 39194069 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment Strategies Guided by [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer and [18F]FDG-Positive Lymph Nodes.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;16(4):717. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040717. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38398108 Free PMC article.
-
Fertility-sparing surgery vs standard surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: difference in 5-year life expectancy by tumor size.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jun;230(6):663.e1-663.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.012. Epub 2024 Feb 15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38365097
-
Social determinants influencing cervical cancer diagnosis: an ecological study.Int J Equity Health. 2023 May 25;22(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01912-8. Int J Equity Health. 2023. PMID: 37231421 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of bulky lymph nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer: boosting versus debulking.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Jul 4;32(7):861-868. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003357. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35483738 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(4):212–236 - PubMed
-
- Watson M, Saraiya M, Benard Vet al.Burden of cervical cancer in the United States, 1998–2003. Cancer. 2008;113(10 suppl):2855–2864 - PubMed
-
- Altekruse SFKC, Krapcho M, Neyman Net al.SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2007. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2010
-
- Ferrante JM, Gonzalez EC, Roetzheim RG, Pal N, Woodard L. Clinical and demographic predictors of late-stage cervical cancer. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(5):439–445 - PubMed
-
- Free K, Roberts S, Bourne Ret al.Cancer of the cervix—old and young, now and then. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;43(2):129–136 - PubMed
