Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;48(1):70-94.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01441.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

The impact of health information technology adoption by outpatient facilities on pregnancy outcomes

Affiliations

The impact of health information technology adoption by outpatient facilities on pregnancy outcomes

Mary E Deily et al. Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Examine whether health information technology (HIT) at nonhospital facilities (NHFs) improves health outcomes and decreases resource use at hospitals within the same heath care network, and whether the impact of HIT varies as providers gain experience using the technologies.

Data sources: Administrative claims data on 491,832 births in Pennsylvania during 1998-2004 from the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council and HIT applications data from the Dorenfest Institute.

Study design: Fixed-effects regression analysis of the impact of HIT at NHFs on adverse birth outcomes and resource use.

Principal findings: Greater use of clinical HIT applications by NHFs is associated with reduced incidence of obstetric trauma and preventable complications, as well as longer lengths of stay. In addition, the beneficial effects of HIT increase the longer that technologies have been in use. However, we find no consistent evidence on whether or how nonclinical HIT in NHFs affects either resource use or health outcomes.

Conclusions: Clinical HIT applications at NHFs may reduce the likelihood of adverse birth outcomes, particularly after physicians and staff gain experience using the technologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Impact of Clinical Technology on Health Outcomes over Time1Notes. Dashed lines represent the 90% confidence interval, cluster-corrected at the health care system-level.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Hospital Association. Annual Survey Database™. Chicago, IL: Health Forum LLC, an American Hospital Association Company; 1998. -2004.
    1. Baker LC. “Association of Managed Care Market Share and Health Expenditures for Fee-for-Service Medicare Patients”. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;281(5):432–7. - PubMed
    1. Baker LC, Phibbs CS. “Managed Care, Technology Adoption, and Health Care: The Adoption of Neonatal Intensive Care”. RAND Journal of Economics. 2002;33(3):524–48. - PubMed
    1. Barley SR. “The Alignment of Technology and Structure through Roles and Networks”. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1990;35:61–103. - PubMed
    1. Borzekowski R. “Measuring the Cost Impact of Hospital Information Systems: 1987–1994”. Journal of Health Economics. 2009;28:938–49. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms