Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 22777524
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00508
Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus need information about the effectiveness of innovations in insulin delivery and glucose monitoring.
Purpose: To review how intensive insulin therapy (multiple daily injections [MDI] vs. rapid-acting analogue-based continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) or method of monitoring (self-monitoring of blood glucose [SMBG] vs. real-time continuous glucose monitoring [rt-CGM]) affects outcomes in types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus.
Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through February 2012 without language restrictions.
Study selection: 33 randomized, controlled trials in children or adults that compared CSII with MDI (n=19), rt-CGM with SMBG (n=10), or sensor-augmented insulin pump use with MDI and SMBG (n=4).
Data extraction: 2 reviewers independently evaluated studies for eligibility and quality and serially abstracted data.
Data synthesis: In randomized, controlled trials, MDI and CSII showed similar effects on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and severe hypoglycemia in children or adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus and adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus, HbA1c levels decreased more with CSII than with MDI, but 1 study heavily influenced these results. Compared with SMBG, rt-CGM achieved a lower HbA1c level (between-group difference of change, 0.26% [95% CI, 0.33% to 0.19%]) without any difference in severe hypoglycemia. Sensor-augmented insulin pump use decreased HbA1c levels more than MDI and SMBG did in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus (between-group difference of change, 0.68% [CI, 0.81% to 0.54%]). Little evidence was available on other outcomes.
Limitation: Many studies were small, of short duration, and limited to white persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Conclusion: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and MDI have similar effects on glycemic control and hypoglycemia, except CSII has a favorable effect on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. For glycemic control, rt-CGM is superior to SMBG and sensor-augmented insulin pumps are superior to MDI and SMBG without increasing the risk for hypoglycemia.
Primary funding source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Comment in
-
ACP Journal Club. Review: continuous glucose monitoring reduces HbA1c more than self-monitoring in type 1 diabetes.Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 19;158(6):JC9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-6-201303190-02009. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23552900 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Methods for insulin delivery and glucose monitoring in diabetes: summary of a comparative effectiveness review.J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Aug;18(6 Suppl):S1-17. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.s6-a.1. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012. PMID: 22984955 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Methods for Insulin Delivery and Glucose Monitoring: Comparative Effectiveness [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jul. Report No.: 12-EHC036-EF. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jul. Report No.: 12-EHC036-EF. PMID: 22876370 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Optimizing type 1 diabetes after multiple daily injections and capillary blood monitoring: Pump or sensor first? A meta-analysis using pooled differences in outcome measures.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Nov;23(11):2521-2528. doi: 10.1111/dom.14498. Epub 2021 Aug 12. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021. PMID: 34286892
-
Effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Acta Diabetol. 2021 Apr;58(4):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01589-3. Epub 2020 Aug 13. Acta Diabetol. 2021. PMID: 32789691
-
Glycemic Outcomes in Adults With T1D Are Impacted More by Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than by Insulin Delivery Method: 3 Years of Follow-Up From the COMISAIR Study.Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(1):37-43. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0888. Epub 2019 Sep 17. Diabetes Care. 2020. PMID: 31530663 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Effect of Body Weight on Glycaemic Indices in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring.J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 7;13(17):5303. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175303. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39274516 Free PMC article.
-
2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Full Version Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association.Diabetes Metab J. 2024 Jul;48(4):546-708. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2024.0249. Epub 2024 Jul 26. Diabetes Metab J. 2024. PMID: 39091005 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Patient Perspectives on the Benefits and Challenges of Diabetes and Digital Technology.Clin Diabetes. 2024 Spring;42(2):243-256. doi: 10.2337/cd23-0003. Epub 2023 Oct 19. Clin Diabetes. 2024. PMID: 38666210 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Diabetes Education on Continuous Glucose Monitoring in SUS-Dependent Patients in a Northeastern Brazilian City.Life (Basel). 2024 Feb 28;14(3):320. doi: 10.3390/life14030320. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38541647 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between use of diabetes technology and diabetes distress: a Danish cross-sectional survey of adults with type 1 diabetes.BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 25;14(3):e080053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080053. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38531585 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical