Use of drug-eluting stents as a function of predicted benefit: clinical and economic implications of current practice
- PMID: 22777536
- DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3093
Use of drug-eluting stents as a function of predicted benefit: clinical and economic implications of current practice
Abstract
Background: Benefits of drug-eluting stents (DES) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are greatest in those at the highest risk of target-vessel revascularization (TVR). Drug-eluting stents cost more than bare-metal stents (BMS) and necessitate prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which increases costs, bleeding risk, and risk of complications if DAPT is prematurely discontinued. Our objective was to assess whether DES are preferentially used in patients with higher predicted TVR risk and to estimate if lower use of DES in low-TVR-risk patients would be more cost-effective than the existing DES use pattern.
Methods: We analyzed more than 1.5 million PCI procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI registry from 2004 through 2010 and estimated 1-year TVR risk with BMS using a validated model. We examined the association between TVR risk and DES use and the cost-effectiveness of lower DES use in low-TVR-risk patients (50% less DES use among patients with <10% TVR risk) compared with existing DES use.
Results: There was marked variation in physicians' use of DES (range 2%-100%). Use of DES was high across all predicted TVR risk categories (73.9% in TVR risk <10%; 78.0% in TVR risk 10%-20%; and 83.2% in TVR risk >20%), with a modest relationship between TVR risk and DES use (relative risk, 1.005 per 1% increase in TVR risk [95% CI, 1.005-1.006]). Reducing DES use by 50% in low-TVR-risk patients was projected to lower US health care costs by $205 million per year while increasing the overall TVR event rate by 0.5% (95% CI, 0.49%-0.51%) in absolute terms.
Conclusions: Use of DES in the United States varies widely among physicians, with only a modest correlation to patients' risk of restenosis. Less DES use among patients with low risk of restenosis has the potential for significant cost savings for the US health care system while minimally increasing restenosis events.
Comment in
-
How drug-eluting stents illustrate our health system's flawed relationship with technology: comment on "use of drug-eluting stents as a function of predicted benefit".Arch Intern Med. 2012 Aug 13;172(15):1152-3. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2724. Arch Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22777509 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Predicting the restenosis benefit of drug-eluting versus bare metal stents in percutaneous coronary intervention.Circulation. 2011 Oct 4;124(14):1557-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.045229. Epub 2011 Sep 6. Circulation. 2011. PMID: 21900079
-
Predictors and variability of drug-eluting vs bare-metal stent selection in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the PRISM study.Clin Cardiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):521-527. doi: 10.1002/clc.22693. Epub 2017 Mar 16. Clin Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28300284 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in clinical practice.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Jul;4(4):408-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.960187. Epub 2011 Jun 21. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011. PMID: 21693724
-
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec;3(12):1262-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.019. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010. PMID: 21232720 Review.
-
Efficacy of cilostazol in reducing restenosis in patients undergoing contemporary stent based PCI: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.EuroIntervention. 2009 Aug;5(3):384-93. doi: 10.4244/v5i3a60. EuroIntervention. 2009. PMID: 19736165 Review.
Cited by
-
One-Year Follow-Up Results From the Observational, Multicenter, Prospective, and Controlled Registry: The WALTZ All-Comers Study.Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2019 Jun 27;13:1179546819854059. doi: 10.1177/1179546819854059. eCollection 2019. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 31285655 Free PMC article.
-
Disparities In The Use Of Drug-eluting Stents For Diabetic Patients With ST-elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Assisted In the Public versus Private Network - VICTIM Register.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019 May;112(5):564-570. doi: 10.5935/abc.20190054. Epub 2019 Mar 14. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 30892386 Free PMC article.
-
Developing and Testing a Personalized, Evidence-Based, Shared Decision-Making Tool for Stent Selection in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using a Pre-Post Study Design.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005139. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005139. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019. PMID: 30764654 Free PMC article.
-
Older Adults' Perceptions of the Causes and Consequences of Healthcare Overuse: A Qualitative Study.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):892-897. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4264-y. Epub 2018 Jan 3. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29299815 Free PMC article.
-
Can machine learning complement traditional medical device surveillance? A case study of dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.Med Devices (Auckl). 2017 Aug 16;10:165-188. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S138158. eCollection 2017. Med Devices (Auckl). 2017. PMID: 28860874 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
