Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jul-Aug;10(4):312-9.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1383.

Interactive preventive health record to enhance delivery of recommended care: a randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Interactive preventive health record to enhance delivery of recommended care: a randomized trial

Alex H Krist et al. Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Americans receive only one-half of recommended preventive services. Information technologies have been advocated to engage patients. We tested the effectiveness of an interactive preventive health record (IPHR) that links patients to their clinician's record, explains information in lay language, displays tailored recommendations and educational resources, and generates reminders.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial involved 8 primary care practices. Four thousand five hundred patients were randomly selected to receive a mailed invitation to use the IPHR or usual care. Outcomes were measured using patient surveys and electronic medical record data and included IPHR use and service delivery. Comparisons were made between invited and usual-care patients and between users and nonusers among those invited to use the IPHR.

Results: At 4 and 16 months, 229 (10.2%) and 378 (16.8%) of invited patients used the IPHR. The proportion of patients up-to-date with all services increased between baseline and 16 months by 3.8% among intervention patients (from 11.4% to 15.2%, P <.001) and by 1.5% among control patients (from 11.1% to 12.6%, P = .07), a difference of 2.3% (P = .05). Greater increases were observed among patients who used the IPHR. At 16 months, 25.1% of users were up-to-date with all services, double the rate among nonusers. At 4 months, delivery of colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening increased by 19%, 15%, and 13%, respectively, among users.

Conclusions: Information systems that feature patient-centered functionality, such as the IPHR, have potential to increase preventive service delivery. Engaging more patients to use systems could have important public health benefits.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00589173.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
New interactive preventive health record (IPHR) users based on invitations mailed to patients. Note: Number of patients who logged onto the IPHR, established an account, and received prevention recommendations. A total of 2,250 invitations were mailed (intervention population).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348 (26):2635–2645 - PubMed
    1. Goldstein MG, Whitlock EP, DePue JPlanning Committee of the Addressing Multiple Behavioral Risk Factors in Primary Care Project Multiple behavioral risk factor interventions in primary care. Summary of research evidence. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(2)(Suppl):61–79 - PubMed
    1. McNutt RA. Shared medical decision making: problems, process, progress. JAMA. 2004;292(20):2516–2518 - PubMed
    1. O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD001431. - PubMed
    1. O’Connor AM, Légaré F, Stacey D. Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. BMJ. 2003;327(7417):736–740 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data