Justifying referrals for paediatric CT

Med J Aust. 2012 Jul 16;197(2):95-9. doi: 10.5694/mja11.11124.

Abstract

• The system of radiation protection assumes a linear dose-response relationship with no threshold for low doses and dose rate exposures. This is based on epidemiological evidence at higher doses. • Hence there is a small theoretical risk of carcinogenesis attributable to low doses of ionising radiation. This risk is associated with any diagnostic imaging procedure involving radiation. • Radiosensitivity declines with age, so children are more susceptible to radiation risks than adults. Females are more radiosensitive than males. • The radiation protection system is based on the assumption that radiation risk is cumulative over a lifetime. • For an individual, a justified, optimised computed tomography (CT) scan will result in more benefit than harm. A doctor must justify the necessity for a CT scan before referring an individual for imaging.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Age Factors
  • Australia
  • Child
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced / etiology
  • Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced / prevention & control*
  • Pediatrics*
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Radiation Protection*
  • Referral and Consultation*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Sex Factors
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / adverse effects
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / statistics & numerical data*
  • Unnecessary Procedures / adverse effects
  • Unnecessary Procedures / statistics & numerical data*