Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
, 28 (10), 1481-9

Comparison of 2 Femoral Tunnel Locations in Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of 2 Femoral Tunnel Locations in Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study

Matthew D Driscoll et al. Arthroscopy.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using 2 modern clinically relevant single-bundle constructs.

Methods: Two arthroscopic ACL reconstructions were performed on 6 fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees using bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts. The tibial tunnel was centered in the anatomic tibial footprint. The femoral tunnel was reamed through the anteromedial (AM) portal and centered alternately in either the AM portion of the femoral footprint (center-AM) or the center of the femoral footprint (center-center). Two external loading conditions were applied: (1) a 134-N anterior tibial load and (2) a 10-Nm valgus load combined with a 5-Nm internal tibial torque. Resulting kinematics were determined under 4 conditions: (1) ACL intact, (2) ACL deficient, (3) center-AM reconstruction, and (4) center-center reconstruction.

Results: In response to anterior tibial loading, anterior translation was similar in the ACL-intact knee and the 2 reconstructions at 0° to 60° of flexion but was greater in the reconstructed specimens at 90°. In response to the complex rotatory load, internal tibial rotation (ITR) at 30° of flexion was slightly greater in center-AM knees compared with ACL-intact knees (11.0° ± 0.6° v 10.5° ± 0.6°, P = .03). At other angles tested, ITR in both reconstructions was similar to the ACL-intact knee (P > .05). When we compared the 2 reconstruction alternatives, however, center-center knees exhibited greater resistance to ITR at all angles (P < .05).

Conclusion: Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction performed with the femoral tunnel placed through the AM portal restores translational and rotational knee stability to an extent that closely approximates the ACL-intact condition. When compared with the AM femoral tunnel position, a femoral tunnel positioned in the anatomic center of the femoral origin of the ACL may further improve rotatory stability without sacrificing anterior stability.

Clinical relevance: This study provides additional biomechanical evidence in support of anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with tunnels positioned in the center of the femoral and tibial footprints.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 29 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback