Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2012 Jul 25;308(4):362-9.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5664.

Risk of cervical precancer and cancer among HIV-infected women with normal cervical cytology and no evidence of oncogenic HPV infection

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Risk of cervical precancer and cancer among HIV-infected women with normal cervical cytology and no evidence of oncogenic HPV infection

Marla J Keller et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Context: US cervical cancer screening guidelines for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-uninfected women 30 years or older have recently been revised, increasing the suggested interval between Papanicolaou (Pap) tests from 3 years to 5 years among those with normal cervical cytology (Pap test) results who test negative for oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV). Whether a 3-year or 5-year screening interval could be used in HIV-infected women who are cytologically normal and oncogenic HPV-negative is unknown.

Objective: To determine the risk of cervical precancer or cancer defined cytologically (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or greater [HSIL+]) or histologically (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or greater [CIN-2+]), as 2 separate end points, in HIV-infected women and HIV-uninfected women who at baseline had a normal Pap test result and were negative for oncogenic HPV.

Design, setting, and participants: Participants included 420 HIV-infected women and 279 HIV-uninfected women with normal cervical cytology at their enrollment in a multi-institutional US cohort of the Women's Interagency HIV Study, between October 1, 2001, and September 30, 2002, with follow-up through April 30, 2011. Semiannual visits at 6 clinical sites included Pap testing and, if indicated, cervical biopsy. Cervicovaginal lavage specimens from enrollment were tested for HPV DNA using polymerase chain reaction. The primary analysis was truncated at 5 years of follow-up.

Main outcome measure: Five-year cumulative incidence of cervical precancer and cancer.

Results: No oncogenic HPV was detected in 369 (88% [95% CI, 84%-91%]) HIV-infected women and 255 (91% [95% CI, 88%-94%]) HIV-uninfected women with normal cervical cytology at enrollment. Among these oncogenic HPV-negative women, 2 cases of HSIL+ were observed; an HIV-uninfected woman and an HIV-infected woman with a CD4 cell count of 500 cells/μL or greater. Histologic data were obtained from 4 of the 6 clinical sites. There were 6 cases of CIN-2+ in 145 HIV-uninfected women (cumulative incidence, 5% [95% CI, 1%-8%]) and 9 cases in 219 HIV-infected women (cumulative incidence, 5% [95% CI, 2%-8%]). This included 1 case of CIN-2+ in 44 oncogenic HPV-negative HIV-infected women with CD4 cell count less than 350 cells/μL (cumulative incidence, 2% [95% CI, 0%-7%]), 1 case in 47 women with CD4 cell count of 350 to 499 cells/μL (cumulative incidence, 2% [95% CI, 0%-7%]), and 7 cases in 128 women with CD4 cell count of 500 cells/μL or greater (cumulative incidence, 6% [95% CI, 2%-10%]). One HIV-infected and 1 HIV-uninfected woman had CIN-3, but none had cancer.

Conclusion: The 5-year cumulative incidence of HSIL+ and CIN-2+ was similar in HIV-infected women and HIV-uninfected women who were cytologically normal and oncogenic HPV-negative at enrollment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Censoring among cytologically normal, oncogenic HPV-negative women in the life-table analysis, by year of follow-up and HIV status. A. Loss to follow-up and censoring for cervical treatment (including hysterectomy) among women in the analysis of HSIL+. In life-table analysis all censoring is assumed to occur uniformly throughout each interval (see Statistical Methods). Thus, in the analysis of HSIL+, 70% (effective sample size 218 + 1 case) of the 255 HIV-uninfected women and 67% (effective sample size 245 non-cases + 1 case) of the 369 HIV-infected women contributed five years of observation. The corresponding rates of follow-up at 3 years of observation were 86% and 81%, respectively. B. Loss to follow-up and censoring for cervical treatment among women in the analysis of CIN-2+. In the analysis of CIN-2+, 82% (113 non-cases + 6 cases) of 145 HIV-uninfected women and 78% (162 non-cases + 9 cases) of 219 HIV-infected women contributed five years of observation to the analysis of CIN-2+. The corresponding rates of follow-up at 3 years of observation were 92% and 88%, respectively.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Censoring among cytologically normal, oncogenic HPV-negative women in the life-table analysis, by year of follow-up and HIV status. A. Loss to follow-up and censoring for cervical treatment (including hysterectomy) among women in the analysis of HSIL+. In life-table analysis all censoring is assumed to occur uniformly throughout each interval (see Statistical Methods). Thus, in the analysis of HSIL+, 70% (effective sample size 218 + 1 case) of the 255 HIV-uninfected women and 67% (effective sample size 245 non-cases + 1 case) of the 369 HIV-infected women contributed five years of observation. The corresponding rates of follow-up at 3 years of observation were 86% and 81%, respectively. B. Loss to follow-up and censoring for cervical treatment among women in the analysis of CIN-2+. In the analysis of CIN-2+, 82% (113 non-cases + 6 cases) of 145 HIV-uninfected women and 78% (162 non-cases + 9 cases) of 219 HIV-infected women contributed five years of observation to the analysis of CIN-2+. The corresponding rates of follow-up at 3 years of observation were 92% and 88%, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al. American Cancer Society. American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. American Society for Clinical Pathology Screening Guidelines for the Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer Journal of lower genital tract disease. 2012 Mar 13; - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moyer VA. Screening for Cervical Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 14; - PubMed
    1. Wright TC, Jr., Massad LS, Dunton CJ, Spitzer M, Wilkinson EJ, Solomon D. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical screening tests. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007 Oct;11(4):201–222. - PubMed
    1. Whitlock EP, Vesco KK, Eder M, Lin JS, Senger CA, Burda BU. Liquid-Based Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Testing to Screen for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 17; - PubMed
    1. Stout NK, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Ortendahl JD, Goldie SJ. Trade-offs in cervical cancer prevention: balancing benefits and risks. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 22;168(17):1881–1889. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types