[Bone substitute. Transplants and replacement materials--an update]
- PMID: 22821191
- DOI: 10.1007/s00113-012-2238-4
[Bone substitute. Transplants and replacement materials--an update]
Abstract
Due to the special characteristics, autologous bone for bone grafting remains the gold standard for defect filling. Besides allogenic bone transplants, as an alternative a set of bone substitutes has been established. An overview of the bone substitutes presently on the market is almost lost due to the abundance of products. The present paper gives a review of the materials available on the market. Different classification systems regarding origin, vitality, biological priority and chemical composition are described as well as the individual materials including the advantages and disadvantages. Finally, a description of tissue engineering and gene therapy gives a view of future prospective.
Similar articles
-
Bone graft substitutes currently available in orthopaedic practice: the evidence for their use.Bone Joint J. 2013 May;95-B(5):583-97. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B5.30286. Bone Joint J. 2013. PMID: 23632666 Review.
-
A review of bone substitutes.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Nov;19(4):513-21, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2007.06.002. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007. PMID: 18088902 Review.
-
The use of bone graft substitutes in large cancellous voids: any specific needs?Injury. 2011 Sep;42 Suppl 2:S87-90. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.020. Epub 2011 Jul 2. Injury. 2011. PMID: 21723553
-
[Filling in bone loss].Rev Infirm. 1997 Oct;(31):20-4. Rev Infirm. 1997. PMID: 9483024 French. No abstract available.
-
The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: any specific needs?Injury. 2011 Sep;42 Suppl 2:S56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Jul 12. Injury. 2011. PMID: 21752369 Review.
Cited by
-
[The severely injured older cyclist-Evaluation of the TraumaRegister DGU® : Retrospective, multicenter cross-sectional study based on the TraumaRegister DGU®].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Dec;126(12):952-959. doi: 10.1007/s00113-022-01286-6. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023. PMID: 36988660 Free PMC article. German.
-
Comparison of degradation behavior and osseointegration of 3D powder-printed calcium magnesium phosphate cement scaffolds with alkaline or acid post-treatment.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 28;10:998254. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.998254. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 36246367 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of Naturally Occurring Bioactive Factor Mixtures for Bone Regeneration.Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 19;21(4):1412. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041412. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32093051 Free PMC article.
-
Osteointegration of porous absorbable bone substitutes: A systematic review of the literature.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Jul;72(7):449-453. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(07)10. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017. PMID: 28793006 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Prefabrication of vascularized facial bones].Chirurg. 2015 Mar;86(3):254-8. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2884-x. Chirurg. 2015. PMID: 25712784 Review. German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
