Recommendations to limit life support: a national survey of critical care physicians
- PMID: 22837382
- PMCID: PMC3480524
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201202-0354OC
Recommendations to limit life support: a national survey of critical care physicians
Abstract
Rationale: There is debate about whether physicians should routinely provide patient surrogates with recommendations about limiting life support.
Objectives: To explore physicians' self-reported practices and attitudes.
Methods: A cross-sectional, stratified survey of 1,000 randomly selected US critical care physicians was mailed. We included a vignette to experimentally examine how surrogate desire for a recommendation and physician agreement with the surrogate modified whether physicians would provide a recommendation.
Measurements and main results: Proportion of respondents reporting they routinely provide surrogates with a recommendation and how responses varied based on vignette characteristics. A total of 608 (66%) of 922 eligible physicians participated. Approximately one (22%) in five reported always providing surrogates with a recommendation, whereas 1 (11%) in 10 reported rarely or never doing so. Almost all respondents reported comfort making recommendations (92%) and viewed them as appropriate (93%). Most also viewed recommendations as a critical care physician's duty (87%) and did not view them as unduly influential (80%). Approximately two-fifths (41%) believed recommendations were only appropriate if sought by surrogates. In response to the vignettes, nearly all respondents (91%) provided a recommendation when the surrogate requested a recommendation and the physician agreed with the surrogate's likely decision. Physicians were less likely to provide an unwanted recommendation, both when physicians agreed (29%) and disagreed with the surrogate's likely decision (44%).
Conclusions: There is substantial variation among physicians' self-reported use of recommendations to surrogates of critically ill adults. Surrogates' desires for recommendations and physicians' agreement with surrogates' likely decisions may have important influence on whether recommendations are provided.
Figures
Comment in
-
Limitations at the end of life.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Oct 1;186(7):581-2. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1365ED. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 23027849 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Are physicians' recommendations to limit life support beneficial or burdensome? Bringing empirical data to the debate.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Aug 15;180(4):320-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200811-1776OC. Epub 2009 Jun 4. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009. PMID: 19498057 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Surrogate Decision Makers on Clinical Decision Making for Critically Ill Adults.J Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jul;30(5):278-85. doi: 10.1177/0885066613516597. Epub 2013 Dec 20. J Intensive Care Med. 2015. PMID: 24362444
-
Surrogate decision makers' responses to physicians' predictions of medical futility.Chest. 2009 Jul;136(1):110-117. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2753. Epub 2009 Mar 24. Chest. 2009. PMID: 19318665 Free PMC article.
-
Expanding the paradigm of the physician's role in surrogate decision-making: an empirically derived framework.Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):743-50. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c58842. Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20029347 Free PMC article.
-
Methods of Observing Variations in Physicians' Decisions: The Opportunities of Clinical Vignettes.J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S586-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3365-8. J Gen Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26105672 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Defining Intensivists: A Retrospective Analysis of the Published Studies in the United States, 2010-2020.Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 1;52(2):223-236. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005984. Epub 2024 Jan 19. Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38240506
-
Addressing clinician moral distress: Implications from a mixed methods evaluation during Covid-19.PLoS One. 2023 Sep 15;18(9):e0291542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291542. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37713379 Free PMC article.
-
Recommendation-making in the emergency department: A qualitative study of how Canadian emergency physicians guide treatment decisions about resuscitation in critically ill patients.J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 May 23;4(3):e12962. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12962. eCollection 2023 Jun. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023. PMID: 37229184 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Providing Recommendations During Goals-of-Care Conversations: A Multisite Survey.J Palliat Med. 2023 Jul;26(7):951-959. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0394. Epub 2023 Mar 21. J Palliat Med. 2023. PMID: 36944150 Free PMC article.
-
Variability of Prognostic Communication in Critically Ill Neurologic Patients: A Pilot Multicenter Mixed-Methods Study.Crit Care Explor. 2022 Feb 21;4(2):e0640. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000640. eCollection 2022 Feb. Crit Care Explor. 2022. PMID: 35224505 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Weissfeld LA, Watson RS, Rickert T, Rubenfeld GD. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med 2004;32:638–643 - PubMed
-
- Cook D, Rocker G, Marshall J, Sjokvist P, Dodek P, Griffith L, Freitag A, Varon J, Bradley C, Levy M, et al. Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in anticipation of death in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1123–1132 - PubMed
-
- Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1163–1167 - PubMed
-
- Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:15–20 - PubMed
-
- Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LS, Cohen NH, Lo B, Cooke M, Schecter WP, Fink C, Epstein-Jaffe E, May C, et al. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med 1990;322:309–315 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
