Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012:7:437-45.
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S31418. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

Design, rationale, and baseline demographics of SEARCH I: a prospective cluster-randomized study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Design, rationale, and baseline demographics of SEARCH I: a prospective cluster-randomized study

Frank Albers et al. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012.

Abstract

Questionnaires are available to identify patients at risk for several chronic diseases, including COPD, but are infrequently utilized in primary care. COPD is often underdiagnosed, while at the same time the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends against spirometric screening for COPD in asymptomatic adults. Use of a symptom-based questionnaire and subsequent handheld spirometric device depending on the answers to the questionnaire is a promising approach to identify patients at risk for COPD. Screening, Evaluating and Assessing Rate CHanges of diagnosing respiratory conditions in primary care 1 (SEARCH I) was a prospective cluster-randomized study in 168 US primary care practices evaluating the effect of the COPD-Population Screener (COPD-PS™) questionnaire. The effect of this questionnaire alone or sequentially with the handheld copd-6(TM) device was evaluated on new diagnoses of COPD and on respiratory diagnostic practice patterns (including referrals for pulmonary function testing, referrals to pulmonologists, new diagnoses of COPD, and new respiratory medication prescriptions). Participating practices entered a total of 9704 consecutive consenting subjects aged ≥ 40 years attending primary care clinics. Study arm results were compared for new COPD diagnosis rates between usual care and (1) COPD-PS plus copd-6 and (2) COPD-PS alone. A cluster-randomization design allowed comparison of the intervention effects at the practice level instead of individuals being the subjects of the intervention. Regional principal investigators controlled the flow of study information to sub-investigators at participating practices to reduce observation bias (Hawthorne effect). The results of SEARCH I, to be published subsequently, will provide insight into the real world utility of the COPD-PS as well as two-stage COPD case finding with COPD-PS and copd-6.

Keywords: COPD Population Screener; COPD-PS™; case finding; copd-6™; screening; spirometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kleinschmidt P. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Emphysema in Emergency Medicine. Medscape Reference. Oct 10, 2011. [Accessed November 1, 2011]. Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/807143-overview#showall.
    1. US National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Morbidity and Mortality: the 2009 Chart Book on Cardiovascular, Lung, and Blood Diseases. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2009.
    1. Parkes G, Greenhalgh T, Griffin M, Dent R. Effect on smoking quit rate of telling patients their lung age: the Step2quit randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;336(7644):598–600. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Schayck CP, Chavannes CN. Detection of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care. Eur Respir J. 2003;21(Suppl 39):16S–22S. - PubMed
    1. Mannino DM, Gagnon RC, Petty TL, Lydick E. Obstructive lung disease and low lung function in adults in the United States: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(11):1683–1689. - PubMed

Publication types