Immunochemical fecal occult blood testing is equally sensitive for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia
- PMID: 22850431
- DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.249
Immunochemical fecal occult blood testing is equally sensitive for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia
Abstract
Objective: Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to estimate its diagnostic accuracy in invitational population screening measured against colonoscopy.
Methods: Participants (50-75 years) in an invitational primary colonoscopy screening program were asked to complete one sample FIT before colonoscopy. We estimated FIT sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in detecting CRC and advanced neoplasia (carcinomas and advanced adenomas) for cutoff levels of 50 (FIT50), 75 (FIT75), and 100 (FIT100) ng hemoglobin (Hb)/ml, corresponding with, respectively, 10, 15 and 20 μg Hb/g feces.
Results: A total of 1,256 participants underwent a FIT and screening colonoscopy. Advanced neoplasia was detected by colonoscopy in 119 (9%), 8 (0.6%) of them had CRC. At FIT50, 121 (10%) had a positive test result; 45 (37%) had advanced neoplasia and 7 (6%) had CRC. A total of 74 of 1,135 FIT50 negatives (7%) had advanced neoplasia including 1 (0.1%) CRC. FIT50 had a sensitivity of 38% (95% confidence interval (CI): 29-47) for advanced neoplasia and 88% (95% CI: 37-99) for CRC at a specificity of 93% (95% CI: 92-95) and 91% (95% CI: 89-92), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values for FIT50 were 6% (95% CI: 3-12) and almost 100% (95% CI: 99-100) for CRC, and 37% (95% CI: 29-46) and 93% (95% CI: 92-95) for advanced neoplasia. The sensitivity and specificity of FIT75 for advanced neoplasia were 33% (95% CI: 25-42) and 96% (95% CI: 94-97). At FIT100, 71 screenees (6%) had a positive test result. The sensitivity and specificity of FIT100 were for advanced neoplasia 31% (95% CI: 23-40) and 97% (95% CI: 96-98), and for CRC 75% (95% CI: 36-96) and 95% (95% CI: 93-96). The area under curve for detecting advanced neoplasia was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.64-0.76). FIT had a similar sensitivity for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia at cutoffs of 50 (38% vs. 37%; P=0.99), 75 (33% vs. 31%; P=0.85) and 100 (33% vs. 29%; P=0.68) ng Hb/ml.
Discussion: Nine out of ten screening participants with CRC and four out of ten with advanced neoplasia will be detected using one single FIT at low cutoff. Sensitivity in detecting proximal and distal advanced neoplasia is comparable.
Comment in
-
ACP Journal Club. A single FIT (≥ 50 ng Hb/mL) detected 38% of screen-detected advanced colorectal neoplasia.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Nov 20;157(10):JC5-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-10-201211200-02010. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 23165686 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Qualitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Varies With Location of Neoplasia But Not Number of Specimens.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug;13(8):1472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.02.021. Epub 2015 Feb 24. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 25724708
-
Lower risk of advanced neoplasia among patients with a previous negative result from a fecal test for colorectal cancer.Gastroenterology. 2012 Mar;142(3):497-504. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.11.024. Epub 2011 Nov 19. Gastroenterology. 2012. PMID: 22108194 Clinical Trial.
-
Test performance of immunologic fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy compared with primary colonoscopy screening for colorectal advanced adenomas.Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011 Oct;4(10):1563-71. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0076. Epub 2011 Jul 12. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011. PMID: 21750209
-
[Chemical or immunological tests for the detection of fecal occult blood in colorectal cancer screening?].Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Oct;32(8):565-76. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.01.179. Epub 2009 Jul 3. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009. PMID: 19577340 Review. Spanish.
-
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD009276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009276.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35665911 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Fecal Immunochemical Test Positivity Thresholds: An International Survey of Population-Based Screening Programs.Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Nov 11. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08664-7. Online ahead of print. Dig Dis Sci. 2024. PMID: 39528850 Review.
-
An Adjustable Positivity Threshold for Non-invasive Screening Tests for Colorectal Neoplasms Can Improve Screening Program Effectiveness and Feasibility.Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Oct 9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08657-6. Online ahead of print. Dig Dis Sci. 2024. PMID: 39384709 Review.
-
Colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel diseases share common salivary proteomic pathways.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):17711. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68400-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39085299 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical performance of fecal calprotectin, lactoferrin, and hemoglobin for evaluating the disease activity of IBD and detecting colorectal tumors.JGH Open. 2024 Jun 4;8(6):e13077. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.13077. eCollection 2024 Jun. JGH Open. 2024. PMID: 38835337 Free PMC article.
-
Potential Modifiers and Different Cut-offs in Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colon Neoplasia: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis.Middle East J Dig Dis. 2022 Oct;14(4):382-395. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2022.299. Epub 2022 Oct 30. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2022. PMID: 37547494 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
