Comparative effectiveness of basal-bolus versus premix analog insulin on glycemic variability and patient-centered outcomes during insulin intensification in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial
- PMID: 22851487
- DOI: 10.1210/jc.2012-1763
Comparative effectiveness of basal-bolus versus premix analog insulin on glycemic variability and patient-centered outcomes during insulin intensification in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial
Abstract
Context: In patients with diabetes, intraday glucose variability might predict health outcomes independently from glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c).
Objective: Our objective was to evaluate patient satisfaction (PS), quality of life (QoL), glycemic control, and variability during insulin intensification to HbA1c below 7.0%.
Patients, design, and setting: Eighty-two type 1 and 306 insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients (47% male; age 54±11 yr; HbA1c=7.8±0.7%) participated in this multicenter, randomized, crossover trial at 52 U.S. centers.
Interventions: Interventions included insulin glargine plus premeal glulisine (n=192) vs. twice-daily premix 75/25 or 70/30 analog insulin (n=196) for 12 wk and crossed to the alternate arm for 12 wk.
Main outcome measures: Main outcome measures included PS and QoL questionnaires, 3-d continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and HbA1c every 4-8 wk.
Results: Mean±se HbA1c change was -0.39±0.09% for glargine-glulisine and -0.05±0.09% for premix (P<0.0001). The PS net benefit scale (0-100) improved from 51.1 to 60.5±1.2 for glargine-glulisine and worsened to 45.4±1.2 for premix (P<0.0001). The PS regimen acceptance scale was comparable (P=0.33). Overall QoL favored glargine-glulisine (P<0.001), as did perceived health (P<0.0001), symptom distress (P<0.0001), general health perceptions (P<0.01), and psychosocial (P<0.02). CGM daily glucose mean, daily glucose sd (glycemic variability), and percent time over 140 mg/dl were lower for glargine-glulisine by 13.1±2.7 mg/dl, 5.9±1.4 mg/dl, and 7.3±1.6%, respectively (all P<0.0001), with no difference in CGM percent time below 70 mg/dl (P=0.09). Symptomatic hypoglycemia rates were comparable. HbA1c, mean CGM daily glucose, and glycemic variability were independent predictors of PS net benefit.
Conclusions: Patient satisfaction was impacted more positively by improved QoL, reduced glucose variability, and better glycemic control with a basal-bolus regimen than negatively by the burden of additional injections, thereby facilitating insulin intensification and the ability to achieve HbA1c below 7.0%.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00135941.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness and tolerability of treatment intensification to basal-bolus therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes on previous basal insulin-supported oral therapy with insulin glargine or supplementary insulin therapy with insulin glulisine: the PARTNER observational study.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015 Nov 6;11:569-78. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S82720. eCollection 2015. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015. PMID: 26604774 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of insulin detemir and insulin glargine in a basal-bolus regimen, with insulin aspart as the mealtime insulin, in patients with type 1 diabetes: a 52-week, multinational, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target noninferiority trial.Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2086-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.006. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19922879 Clinical Trial.
-
Glycemic control with insulin glargine plus insulin glulisine versus premixed insulin analogues in real-world practices: a cost-effectiveness study with a randomized pragmatic trial design.Clin Ther. 2011 Jul;33(7):841-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.091. Epub 2011 Jun 30. Clin Ther. 2011. PMID: 21719107 Clinical Trial.
-
Insulin glargine in the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;2(1):59-67. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2006.2.1.59. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006. PMID: 17319470 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An update on the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: focus on insulin detemir, a long-acting human insulin analog.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010 Jun 1;6:399-410. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s10397. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010. PMID: 20539842 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Full Version Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association.Diabetes Metab J. 2024 Jul;48(4):546-708. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2024.0249. Epub 2024 Jul 26. Diabetes Metab J. 2024. PMID: 39091005 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: Insights into clinical efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and adherence challenges.World J Diabetes. 2024 May 15;15(5):828-852. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i5.828. World J Diabetes. 2024. PMID: 38766443 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The efficacy and safety of combined GLP-1RA and basal insulin therapy among inadequately controlled T2D with premixed insulin therapy.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Mar 10;102(10):e33167. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033167. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 36897731 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative study of the usefulness of a novel insulin therapy in Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes for concomitant use of an oral antidiabetic agent with twice-daily dosing either of insulin aspart, biphasic insulin aspart-30, or insulin detemir: Two times Insulin injection Combined with oral therapy Efficacy Study (TWICE study).Fujita Med J. 2021;7(1):1-7. doi: 10.20407/fmj.2019-023. Epub 2020 Jul 14. Fujita Med J. 2021. PMID: 35111536 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Premixed Insulin, Metformin, and a Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist as a Therapeutic Approach for Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes Spectr. 2020 May;33(2):182-189. doi: 10.2337/ds19-0025. Diabetes Spectr. 2020. PMID: 32425456 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
