Participation, socioeconomic status and group or individual counselling intervention in individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes: one-year follow-up study of the FIN-D2D-project

Prim Care Diabetes. 2012 Dec;6(4):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Aug 4.

Abstract

Aims: To describe socioeconomic characteristics of participants and their effect on uptake and completion of the implementation project (FIN-D2D) for the National Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Programme. Furthermore, to assess the effectiveness of individual vs. group intervention during one-year follow-up.

Methods: At baseline, 2820 men and 5764 women aged <65 years participated in the non-randomized implementation project in primary health care setting; one-year follow-up was available for 1067 men and 2122 women. Socioeconomic status included education and occupation. Interventions were individual and/or group-based. The changes in cardiovascular risk factors and glucose tolerance were used as measures of the effectiveness of intervention.

Results: 68.4% of the men and 69.8% of the women participated in some of the intervention modalities offered. Low education and not working were related to active participation in the intervention in men. 88.2% of men and 76.1% of women selected the individual instead of group intervention. The effectiveness of individual vs. group interventions did not differ, except for minor changes in systolic blood pressure in women and glucose tolerance in men.

Conclusions: Socioeconomic status modulated participation in interventions. Both types of intervention worked equally well, but participation in group intervention was low.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Counseling*
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / diagnosis
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / epidemiology
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / prevention & control*
  • Educational Status
  • Employment
  • Female
  • Finland / epidemiology
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Group Processes*
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Odds Ratio
  • Patient Compliance*
  • Patient Preference
  • Primary Health Care
  • Primary Prevention / methods*
  • Program Evaluation
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Reduction Behavior*
  • Sex Factors
  • Social Class*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome