Implementation of Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment in nursing homes in California: evaluation of a novel statewide dissemination mechanism
- PMID: 22878851
- PMCID: PMC3539039
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2178-2
Implementation of Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment in nursing homes in California: evaluation of a novel statewide dissemination mechanism
Abstract
Background: Implementing Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms aims to improve communication of life-sustaining treatment preferences across care venues. California enabled this clinical tool in 2009, and a novel intervention of community coalitions was undertaken to advance POLST in localities around the state. Coalitions engaged facilities, including nursing homes (NHs), to foster POLST adoption. Eighteen months after introduction of POLST, we studied POLST implementation in California NHs.
Methods: NHs randomly selected in coalition and non-coalition areas were mailed surveys about POLST preparation and use in 2010. Coalitions identified which NHs they worked with.
Results: Of 546 NHs surveyed, 143 (52 %) in coalition areas and 141 (52 %) in non-coalition areas responded. In 82 % of responding NHs, staff received POLST education and 59 % of NHs reported having a formal policy on handling POLST. Two-thirds of NHs had admitted a resident with a POLST, and 15 % of newly admitted residents over the past month had a POLST (range 0-100 %). Eighty-one percent of NHs had completed a POLST with a resident. Fifty-four percent of residents were estimated to have a POLST (range 0-100 %) (coalition area NHs 60 % vs. non- coalition area NHs 48 %, p = 0.02). Within coalition areas, NHs that had worked with coalitions were more likely to have completed a POLST with a resident after admission than NHs that had not worked with coalitions. Few NHs (7 %) reported difficulty following POLST orders, but 38 % noted difficulty involving physicians in POLST completion.
Conclusion: Less than 2 years after introduction, many California nursing homes report using POLST, although some NHs reported no experience. A novel community coalition intervention facilitated POLST implementation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors describe the following conflicts of interest concerning this research: Neil S. Wenger received funding from the California HealthCare Foundation for this project. Judy Citko received funding from the California HealthCare Foundation. Kate O’Malley was employed by the California HealthCare Foundation. Allison Diamant, Karl Lorenz, Victor Gonzalez, Mimi Tarn declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment among California Nursing Home Residents.J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1119-26. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3728-9. Epub 2016 May 17. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27188700 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing physician orders for life-sustaining treatment in California hospitals: factors associated with adoption.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Aug;61(8):1337-44. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12367. Epub 2013 Jul 18. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013. PMID: 23865958
-
Care preferences in physician orders for life sustaining treatment in California nursing homes.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jul;70(7):2040-2050. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17737. Epub 2022 Mar 11. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022. PMID: 35275398 Free PMC article.
-
Use of the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program in the clinical setting: a systematic review of the literature.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Feb;63(2):341-50. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13248. Epub 2015 Jan 29. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015. PMID: 25644280 Review.
-
POLST: An improvement over traditional advance directives.Cleve Clin J Med. 2012 Jul;79(7):457-64. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.79a.11098. Cleve Clin J Med. 2012. PMID: 22751627 Review.
Cited by
-
Timing of Goals of Care Discussions in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review.J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Dec;24(12):1820-1830. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.09.024. Epub 2023 Oct 31. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023. PMID: 37918815 Review.
-
Factors associated with concordance between POLST orders and current treatment preferences.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jul;69(7):1865-1876. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17095. Epub 2021 Mar 24. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021. PMID: 33760241 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Regional and State Initiatives in Nursing Home Advance Care Planning Policies.Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Sep;38(9):1135-1141. doi: 10.1177/1049909120970117. Epub 2020 Oct 28. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021. PMID: 33111537 Free PMC article.
-
Do Life-sustaining Treatment Orders Match Patient and Surrogate Preferences? The Role of POLST.J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):413-421. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06292-1. Epub 2020 Oct 27. J Gen Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33111241 Free PMC article.
-
Variations in Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Program across the Nation: Environmental Scan.J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(9):1032-1038. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0626. Epub 2019 Feb 21. J Palliat Med. 2019. PMID: 30789297 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ghusn HF, Teasdale TA, Jordan D. Continuity of do-not resuscitate orders between hospital and nursing home settings. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:465–469. - PubMed
-
- Wenger NS, Oye RK, Desbiens NA, et al. The stability of DNR orders on hospital readmission. J Clin Ethics. 1996;7:48–54. - PubMed
-
- Wenger NS, Phillips RS, Teno JM, Oye RK, Dawson NV, Liu HH, Califf R, Layde P, Hakim R, Lynn J. Physician understanding of patient resuscitation preferences: insights and clinical implications. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:S44–S51. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
