A noninvasive multianalyte urine-based diagnostic assay for urothelial cancer of the bladder in the evaluation of hematuria
- PMID: 22883743
- PMCID: PMC3538492
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.04.013
A noninvasive multianalyte urine-based diagnostic assay for urothelial cancer of the bladder in the evaluation of hematuria
Abstract
Objective: To test whether a noninvasive urine-based multianalyte diagnostic readout assay that uses protein and DNA biomarkers can risk stratify patients with hematuria into those who are or are not likely to have bladder cancer and those who should receive standard care.
Patients and methods: This prospective, observational, multicenter, single-assessment study was conducted between June 12, 2009, and April 15, 2011. Eligible patients presented with hematuria and as part of their evaluation underwent cystoscopy. Urine samples were analyzed for the presence of mutant FGFR3 and quantified matrix metalloproteinase 2 and the hypermethylation of TWIST1 and NID2. A patient's chance of having (positive predictive value [PPV]) or not having (negative predictive value [NPV]) cancer was determined by FGFR3 alone or by all 4 biomarkers, respectively.
Results: Cystoscopy/biopsy diagnosed 690 of 748 patients as negative and 58 as positive for bladder cancer. Of 21 patients identified by FGFR3 as highly likely to have cancer, 20 were also positive by cystoscopy/biopsy, resulting in a PPV of 95.2% (20 of 21), with specificity of 99.9% (689 of 690). The 4-marker combination identified 395 patients as having a low likelihood of cancer. Of these, 56.2% (388 of 690) also had negative biopsy/cystoscopy findings, resulting in an NPV of 98.2% (388 of 395). In total, 416 of the 748 patients with hematuria (55.6%) were identified with extremely high NPV and PPV to have or not have bladder cancer.
Conclusion: This multianalyte assay accurately stratified patients with high confidence into those who likely do or do not have bladder cancer. This test was developed to enhance and not to eliminate referrals for urologic evaluation.
Copyright © 2012 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Multi-institutional external validation of urinary TWIST1 and NID2 methylation as a diagnostic test for bladder cancer.Urol Oncol. 2015 Sep;33(9):387.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 May 28. Urol Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26027762
-
Urinary NID2 and TWIST1 methylation to augment conventional urine cytology for the detection of bladder cancer.Cancer Biomark. 2017;18(4):381-387. doi: 10.3233/CBM-160261. Cancer Biomark. 2017. PMID: 28106542
-
Validation of a DNA Methylation-Mutation Urine Assay to Select Patients with Hematuria for Cystoscopy.J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):590-595. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.118. Epub 2016 Oct 13. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 27746284
-
RNA-based urinary assays for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.Curr Opin Urol. 2022 Sep 1;32(5):523-530. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001018. Curr Opin Urol. 2022. PMID: 35916010 Review.
-
NMP-22 for bladder cancer screening and surveillance.Urol Nurs. 2004 Jun;24(3):171-2, 177-9, 186. Urol Nurs. 2004. PMID: 15311485 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic Performance of Biomarkers for Bladder Cancer Detection Suitable for Community and Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;15(3):709. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030709. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36765672 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiologic Profile of Microscopic Hematuria in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Iran J Public Health. 2022 Oct;51(10):2194-2206. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v51i10.10978. Iran J Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36415806 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Trends in urine biomarker discovery for urothelial bladder cancer: DNA, RNA, or protein?Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jun;10(6):2787-2808. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1327. Transl Androl Urol. 2021. PMID: 34295762 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of Diagnostic Yield of Cystoscopy and Computed Tomographic Urography for Urinary Tract Cancers in Patients Evaluated for Microhematuria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218409. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8409. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33970257 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review on mutation markers for bladder cancer diagnosis in urine.BJU Int. 2021 Jan;127(1):12-27. doi: 10.1111/bju.15137. Epub 2020 Aug 16. BJU Int. 2021. PMID: 32539176 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nieder A.M., Lotan Y., Nuss G.R. Are patients with hematuria appropriately referred to urology?: a multi-institutional questionnaire based survey. Urol Oncol. 2010;28(5):500–503. - PubMed
-
- Khadra M.H., Pickard R.S., Charlton M., Powell P.H., Neal D.E. A prospective analysis of 1,930 patients with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice. J Urol. 2000;163(2):524–527. - PubMed
-
- Johnson E.K., Daignault S., Zhang Y., Lee C.T. Patterns of hematuria referral to urologists: does a gender disparity exist? Urology. 2008;72(3):498–502. - PubMed
-
- Cohen R.A., Brown R.S. Clinical practice: microscopic hematuria. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(23):2330–2338. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
