Microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: a review

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;40(4):385-91. doi: 10.1002/uog.11180. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

Abstract

G-band chromosomal karyotyping of fetal cells obtained by invasive prenatal testing has been used since the 1960s to identify structural chromosomal anomalies. Prenatal testing is usually performed in response to parental request, increased risk of fetal chromosomal abnormality associated with advanced maternal age, a high-risk screening test and/or the presence of a congenital malformation identified by ultrasonography. The results of karyotyping may inform the long-term prognosis (e.g. aneuploidy being associated with a poor outcome or microscopic chromosomal anomalies predicting global neurodevelopmental morbidity). Relatively recent advances in microarray technology are now enabling high-resolution genome-wide evaluation for DNA copy number abnormalities (e.g. deletions or duplications). While such technological advances promise increased sensitivity and specificity they can also pose difficult challenges of interpretation and clinical management. This review aims to give interested clinicians without an extensive prior knowledge of microarray technology, an overview of its use in prenatal diagnosis, the literature to date, advantages, potential pitfalls and experience from our own tertiary center.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Chromosome Aberrations*
  • Comparative Genomic Hybridization*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Karyotyping
  • Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Diagnosis / methods*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tissue Array Analysis*