Single mutation to a sex pheromone receptor provides adaptive specificity between closely related moth species
- PMID: 22891317
- PMCID: PMC3435168
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1204661109
Single mutation to a sex pheromone receptor provides adaptive specificity between closely related moth species
Abstract
Sex pheromone communication, acting as a prezygotic barrier to mating, is believed to have contributed to the speciation of moths and butterflies in the order Lepidoptera. Five decades after the discovery of the first moth sex pheromone, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that underlie the evolution of pheromone communication between closely related species. Although Asian and European corn borers (ACB and ECB) can be interbred in the laboratory, they are behaviorally isolated from mating naturally by their responses to subtly different sex pheromone isomers, (E)-12- and (Z)-12-tetradecenyl acetate and (E)-11- and (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (ACB: E12, Z12; ECB; E11, Z11). Male moth olfactory systems respond specifically to the pheromone blend produced by their conspecific females. In vitro, ECB(Z) odorant receptor 3 (OR3), a sex pheromone receptor expressed in male antennae, responds strongly to E11 but also generally to the Z11, E12, and Z12 pheromones. In contrast, we show that ACB OR3, a gene that has been subjected to positive selection (ω = 2.9), responds preferentially to the ACB E12 and Z12 pheromones. In Ostrinia species the amino acid residue corresponding to position 148 in transmembrane domain 3 of OR3 is alanine (A), except for ACB OR3 that has a threonine (T) in this position. Mutation of this residue from A to T alters the pheromone recognition pattern by selectively reducing the E11 response ∼14-fold. These results suggest that discrete mutations that narrow the specificity of more broadly responsive sex pheromone receptors may provide a mechanism that contributes to speciation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sex pheromone receptor specificity in the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis.PLoS One. 2010 Jan 13;5(1):e8685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008685. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20084285 Free PMC article.
-
Flight Tunnel Response of Male European Corn Borer Moths to Cross-Specific Mixtures of European and Asian Corn Borer Sex Pheromones: Evidence Supporting a Critical Stage in Evolution of a New Communication System.J Chem Ecol. 2016 Jan;42(1):51-4. doi: 10.1007/s10886-015-0656-9. Epub 2015 Dec 2. J Chem Ecol. 2016. PMID: 26631407
-
A male-specific odorant receptor conserved through the evolution of sex pheromones in Ostrinia moth species.Int J Biol Sci. 2009;5(4):319-30. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.5.319. Epub 2009 Apr 29. Int J Biol Sci. 2009. PMID: 19421342 Free PMC article.
-
Current understandings of olfactory molecular events in the Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae).Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2023 Apr;112(4):e21996. doi: 10.1002/arch.21996. Epub 2022 Dec 27. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2023. PMID: 36575613 Review.
-
Evolution of the Sex Pheromone Communication System in Ostrinia Moths.Insects. 2021 Nov 28;12(12):1067. doi: 10.3390/insects12121067. Insects. 2021. PMID: 34940155 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Dynamic karyotype evolution and unique sex determination systems in Leptidea wood white butterflies.BMC Evol Biol. 2015 May 19;15:89. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0375-4. BMC Evol Biol. 2015. PMID: 25981157 Free PMC article.
-
Transcriptome and expression profiling analysis link patterns of gene expression to antennal responses in Spodoptera litura.BMC Genomics. 2015 Apr 7;16(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1375-x. BMC Genomics. 2015. PMID: 25887537 Free PMC article.
-
Divergence of chemosensing during the early stages of speciation.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 14;117(28):16438-16447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921318117. Epub 2020 Jun 29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020. PMID: 32601213 Free PMC article.
-
Single amino acid residue mediates reciprocal specificity in two mosquito odorant receptors.Elife. 2022 Dec 13;11:e82922. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82922. Elife. 2022. PMID: 36511779 Free PMC article.
-
Odorant Receptors and Odorant-Binding Proteins as Insect Pest Control Targets: A Comparative Analysis.Front Physiol. 2018 Aug 24;9:1163. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01163. eCollection 2018. Front Physiol. 2018. PMID: 30197600 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Schneider D. 100 years of pheromone research. Naturwissenschaften. 1992;79:241–250.
-
- Kristensen NP, Scoble MJ, Karsholt OLE. Lepidoptera phylogeny and systematics: The state of inventorying moth and butterfly diversity. Zootaxa. 2007;1668:699–747.
-
- Cardé RT, Haynes KF. Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. 1st Ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; 2004. pp. 283–332.
-
- Ando T, Inomata SI, Yamamoto M. Lepidopteran sex pheromones. Top Curr Chem. 2004;239:51–96. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
