Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct;102(10):1981-7.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300566. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

Building a consensus on community health workers' scope of practice: lessons from New York

Affiliations

Building a consensus on community health workers' scope of practice: lessons from New York

Sally E Findley et al. Am J Public Health. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated efforts in New York to build a consensus between community health workers (CHWs) and employers on CHWs' scope of practice, training standards, and certification procedures.

Methods: We conducted multiple-choice surveys in 2008 and 2010 with 226 CHWs and 44 employers. We compared CHWs' and employers' recommendations regarding 28 scope of practice elements. The participatory ranking method was used to identify consensus scope of practice recommendations.

Results: There was consensus on 5 scope of practice elements: outreach and community organizing, case management and care coordination, home visits, health education and coaching, and system navigation. For each element, 3 to 4 essential skills were identified, giving a total of 27 skills. These included all skills recommended in national CHW studies, along with 3 unique to New York: computer skills, participatory research methods, and time management.

Conclusions: CHWs and employers in New York were in consensus on CHWs' scope of practice on virtually all of the detailed core competency skills. The CHW scope of practice recommendations of these groups can help other states refine their scope of practice elements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Rankings of community health workers (CHWs) and employers of the most important contributions of CHWs: New York, 2008–2010. Note. An asterisk indicates that an item was included in both the 2008 and 2010 surveys (CHWs, n = 221; employers, n = 40). Other items were included in 2010 only (CHWs, n = 119; employers, n = 21).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rosenthal E, Brownstein J, Rush Cet al.Community health workers: part of the solution. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(7):1338–1342 - PubMed
    1. Nemcek MA, Sabatier R. State of evaluation: community health workers. J Public Health Nurs. 2003;20(4):260–270 - PubMed
    1. Lewin SA, Dick J, Pond Pet al.Lay health workers in primary and community health care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;1:CD004015. - PubMed
    1. Perez M, Findley S, Mejia M, Martinez J. The impact of community health worker training and programs in New York City. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006;17(suppl 1):26–43 - PubMed
    1. Lara M, Cabana MD, Houle CRet al.Improving quality of care and promoting health care system change: the role of community-based coalitions. Health Promot Pract. 2006;7(suppl 2):87S–95S - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources