Meta-analysis of comparison of effectiveness of lowering apolipoprotein B versus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol for cardiovascular risk reduction in randomized trials
- PMID: 22906895
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.007
Meta-analysis of comparison of effectiveness of lowering apolipoprotein B versus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol for cardiovascular risk reduction in randomized trials
Abstract
This study evaluated the relation between apolipoprotein B (apoB) decrease and coronary heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular disease risk. Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis was used to evaluate the association of mean absolute apoB decrease (milligrams per deciliter) with relative risk of coronary heart disease (nonfatal myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease death), stroke (nonfatal stroke and fatal stroke), or cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease, stroke, and coronary revascularization). Analysis included 25 trials (n = 131,134): 12 on statin, 4 on fibrate, 5 on niacin, 2 on simvastatin-ezetimibe, 1 on ileal bypass surgery, and 1 on aggressive versus standard low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and blood pressure targets. Combining the 25 trials, each 10-mg/dl decrease in apoB was associated with a 9% decrease in coronary heart disease, no decrease in stroke, and a 6% decrease in major cardiovascular disease risk. Non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol decrease modestly outperformed apoB decrease for prediction of coronary heart disease (Bayes factor [BF] 1.45) and cardiovascular disease (BF 2.07) risk decrease; apoB decrease added to non-HDL cholesterol plus LDL cholesterol decrease slightly improved cardiovascular disease risk prediction (1.13) but did not improve coronary heart disease risk prediction (BF 1.03) and worsened stroke risk prediction (BF 0.83). In the 12 statin trials, apoB and non-HDL cholesterol decreases similarly predicted cardiovascular disease risk; apoB improved coronary heart disease prediction when added to non-HDL cholesterol/LDL cholesterol decrease (BF 3.33) but did not improve stroke risk prediction when added to non-HDL cholesterol/LDL cholesterol decrease (BF 1.06). In conclusion, across all drug classes, apoB decreases did not consistently improve risk prediction over LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol decreases. For statins, apoB decreases added information to LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol decreases for predicting coronary heart disease but not stroke or overall cardiovascular disease risk decrease.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Association of LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels with risk of cardiovascular events among patients treated with statins: a meta-analysis.JAMA. 2012 Mar 28;307(12):1302-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.366. JAMA. 2012. PMID: 22453571
-
Relations of change in plasma levels of LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apoB with risk reduction from statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Apr 14;3(2):e000759. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000759. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014. PMID: 24732920 Free PMC article.
-
Residual dyslipidemia according to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B among statin-treated US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009-2010.J Clin Lipidol. 2015 Jul-Aug;9(4):525-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 16. J Clin Lipidol. 2015. PMID: 26228670
-
Lowering Targeted Atherogenic Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goals for Patients at "Extreme" ASCVD Risk.Curr Diab Rep. 2019 Nov 21;19(12):146. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1246-y. Curr Diab Rep. 2019. PMID: 31754844 Review.
-
Very low levels of atherogenic lipoproteins and the risk for cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of statin trials.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Aug 5;64(5):485-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.615. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25082583 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
ApoB100 and Atherosclerosis: What's New in the 21st Century?Metabolites. 2024 Feb 12;14(2):123. doi: 10.3390/metabo14020123. Metabolites. 2024. PMID: 38393015 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of the impact of saturated fat from full-fat yogurt or low-fat yogurt and butter on cardiometabolic factors: a randomized cross-over trial.Eur J Nutr. 2024 Jun;63(4):1213-1224. doi: 10.1007/s00394-024-03352-8. Epub 2024 Feb 17. Eur J Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38367032 Clinical Trial.
-
Estimating the Effect of Aerobic Exercise Training on Novel Lipid Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Sports Med. 2023 Apr;53(4):871-886. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01817-0. Epub 2023 Mar 2. Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 36862340 Free PMC article.
-
Lipids in Atherosclerosis: Pathophysiology and the Role of Calculated Lipid Indices in Assessing Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Hyperlipidemia.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 21;24(1):75. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010075. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36613514 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Increased residual cardiovascular risk in U.S. veterans with moderately-elevated baseline triglycerides and well-controlled LDL-C levels on statins.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 4;9:982815. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.982815. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 36407462 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
