Generalized perceptual learning in the absence of sensory adaptation
- PMID: 22921366
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.059
Generalized perceptual learning in the absence of sensory adaptation
Abstract
Repeated performance of visual tasks leads to long-lasting increased sensitivity to the trained stimulus, a phenomenon termed perceptual learning. A ubiquitous property of visual learning is specificity: performance improvement obtained during training applies only for the trained stimulus features, which are thought to be encoded in sensory brain regions [1-3]. However, recent results show performance decrements with an increasing number of trials within a training session [4, 5]. This selective sensitivity reduction is thought to arise due to sensory adaptation [5, 6]. Here we show, using the standard texture discrimination task [7], that location specificity is a consequence of sensory adaptation; that is, it results from selective reduced sensitivity due to repeated stimulation. Observers practiced the texture task with the target presented at a fixed location within a background texture. To remove adaptation, we added task-irrelevant ("dummy") trials with the texture oriented 45° relative to the target's orientation, known to counteract adaptation [8]. The results indicate location specificity with the standard paradigm, but complete generalization to a new location when adaptation is removed. We suggest that adaptation interferes with invariant pattern-discrimination learning by inducing network-dependent changes in local visual representations.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Effects of spatiotemporal consistencies on visual learning dynamics and transfer.Vision Res. 2015 Apr;109(Pt A):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Feb 28. Vision Res. 2015. PMID: 25737285
-
Target-selective tilt aftereffect during texture learning.Vision Res. 2016 Jul;124:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jul 6. Vision Res. 2016. PMID: 27359043
-
Attention alters visual plasticity during exposure-based learning.Curr Biol. 2009 Apr 14;19(7):555-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.063. Epub 2009 Mar 5. Curr Biol. 2009. PMID: 19268592
-
Perceptual learning in Vision Research.Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1552-66. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.019. Epub 2010 Oct 23. Vision Res. 2011. PMID: 20974167 Review.
-
Perceptual learning: specificity versus generalization.Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Apr;15(2):154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.010. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005. PMID: 15831396 Review.
Cited by
-
Editorial: Improving visual deficits with perceptual learning.Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 21;6:491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00491. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25954239 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Neuroimaging Evidence for 2 Types of Plasticity in Association with Visual Perceptual Learning.Cereb Cortex. 2016 Sep;26(9):3681-9. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw176. Epub 2016 Jun 13. Cereb Cortex. 2016. PMID: 27298301 Free PMC article.
-
Response to short-term deprivation of the human adult visual cortex measured with 7T BOLD.Elife. 2018 Nov 26;7:e40014. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40014. Elife. 2018. PMID: 30475210 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives on the Combined Use of Electric Brain Stimulation and Perceptual Learning in Vision.Vision (Basel). 2022 Jun 14;6(2):33. doi: 10.3390/vision6020033. Vision (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35737420 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptual learning in autism: over-specificity and possible remedies.Nat Neurosci. 2015 Nov;18(11):1574-6. doi: 10.1038/nn.4129. Epub 2015 Oct 5. Nat Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26436903
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
