Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;125(11):1085-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.04.038. Epub 2012 Aug 22.

Hospital length of stay in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Affiliations

Hospital length of stay in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

John P Vavalle et al. Am J Med. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Substantial heterogeneity in hospital length of stay exists among patients admitted with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Furthermore, little is known about the factors that impact length of stay.

Methods: We examined 39,107 non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients admitted to 351 Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines hospitals from January 1, 2007-March 31, 2009 who underwent cardiac catheterization and survived to discharge. Length of stay was categorized into 4 groups (≤2, 3-4, 5-7, and ≥8 days), where prolonged length of stay was defined as >4 days.

Results: The overall median (25(th), 75(th)) length of stay was 3 (2, 5) days. Patients with a length of stay of >2 days were older with more comorbidities, but were less likely to receive evidence-based therapies or percutaneous coronary intervention. Among the factors associated with prolonged length of stay >4 days were delay to cardiac catheterization >48 hours, heart failure or shock on admission, female sex, insurance type, and admission to the hospital on a Friday afternoon or evening. Hospital characteristics such as academic versus nonacademic or urban versus rural setting, were not associated with prolonged length of stay.

Conclusion: Patients with longer length of stay have more comorbidities and in-hospital complications, yet paradoxically, are less often treated with evidence-based medications and are less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention. Hospital admission on a Friday afternoon or evening and delays to catheterization appear to significantly impact length of stay. A better understanding of factors associated with length of stay in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is needed to promote safe and early discharge in an era of increasingly restrictive health care resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of LOS
This figure displays the distribution of LOS in days as a percentage of the entire population studied.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Length of Stay based on Time to Catheterization and Occurrence of Complications
This figure displays the median LOS based on whether or not the patients had cardiac catheterization within three days of admission, or at least one complication. Regardless of the presence of complications, those who received cardiac catheterization after three days from admission had a longer hospital LOS.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Length of Stay based on ACTION Registry-GWTG Mortality Risk Score
There is a consistent trend of increased LOS with increased mortality risk, based on the ACTION Registry-GWTG mortality risk score.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Geographical Variation in Hospital Length of Stay
There are important variations in the lengths of stay based on geographical variations in the U.S. The Northeast has highest percentage of patients with LOS ≥5 days, while the West has the highest percentage of patients with LOS ≤2 days and the lowest percentage with LOS ≥5 days.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2007;115:e69–171. - PubMed
    1. Newby LK, Eisenstein EL, Califf RM, Thompson TD, Nelson CL, Peterson ED, Armstrong PW, Van de Werf F, White HD, et al. Cost effectiveness of early discharge after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:749–755. - PubMed
    1. Topol EJ, Burek K, O’Neill WW, et al. A randomized controlled trial of hospital discharge three days after myocardial infarction in the era of reperfusion. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1083–1088. - PubMed
    1. Mark DB, Sigmon K, Topol EJ, et al. Identification of acute myocardial infarction patients suitable for early hospital discharge after aggressive interventional therapy. Results from the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. Circulation. 1991;83:1186–1193. - PubMed
    1. Newby LK, Califf RM, Guerci A, et al. Early discharge in the thrombolytic era: an analysis of criteria for uncomplicated infarction from the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:625–632. - PubMed

Publication types