Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;69(6):1428-37.
doi: 10.1111/jan.12000. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

Text-in-context: a method for extracting findings in mixed-methods mixed research synthesis studies

Affiliations

Text-in-context: a method for extracting findings in mixed-methods mixed research synthesis studies

Margarete Sandelowski et al. J Adv Nurs. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: Our purpose in this paper is to propose a new method for extracting findings from research reports included in mixed-methods mixed research synthesis studies.

Background: International initiatives in the domains of systematic review and evidence synthesis have been focused on broadening the conceptualization of evidence, increased methodological inclusiveness and the production of evidence syntheses that will be accessible to and usable by a wider range of consumers. Initiatives in the general mixed-methods research field have been focused on developing truly integrative approaches to data analysis and interpretation.

Data source: The data extraction challenges described here were encountered, and the method proposed for addressing these challenges was developed, in the first year of the ongoing (2011-2016) study: Mixed-Methods Synthesis of Research on Childhood Chronic Conditions and Family.

Discussion: To preserve the text-in-context of findings in research reports, we describe a method whereby findings are transformed into portable statements that anchor results to relevant information about sample, source of information, time, comparative reference point, magnitude and significance and study-specific conceptions of phenomena.

Implications for nursing: The data extraction method featured here was developed specifically to accommodate mixed-methods mixed research synthesis studies conducted in nursing and other health sciences, but reviewers might find it useful in other kinds of research synthesis studies.

Conclusion: This data extraction method itself constitutes a type of integration to preserve the methodological context of findings when statements are read individually and in comparison to each other.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Austin J, Huberty T. Revision of the Family APGAR for use by 8-year olds. Family Systems Medicine. 1989;7:323–327.
    1. Banning JH. Ecological sentence synthesis. 2003 Jul;:6. Retrieved from http://mycahs.colostate.edu/James.H.Banning/PDFs/Ecological%20Sentence%2....
    1. Barlow J, Ellard D. The psychosocial wellbeing of children with chronic disease, their parents and siblings: An overview of the research evidence base. Child Care Health & Development. 2006;32:19–31. - PubMed
    1. Belgrave LL, Smith KJ. Negotiated validity in collaborative ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry. 1995;1:69–86.
    1. Bryman A. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007;1:8–22.

Publication types