Circumcision policy statement
- PMID: 22926180
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-1989
Circumcision policy statement
Abstract
Male circumcision is a common procedure, generally performed during the newborn period in the United States. In 2007, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) formed a multidisciplinary task force of AAP members and other stakeholders to evaluate the recent evidence on male circumcision and update the Academy's 1999 recommendations in this area. Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks and that the procedure's benefits justify access to this procedure for families who choose it. Specific benefits identified included prevention of urinary tract infections, penile cancer, and transmission of some sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has endorsed this statement.
Comment in
-
Re: Circumcision policy statement.J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4):1378. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.094. Epub 2013 Jul 3. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 24029359 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Male circumcision.Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):e756-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1990. Epub 2012 Aug 27. Pediatrics. 2012. PMID: 22926175
-
Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision.J Med Ethics. 2013 Jul;39(7):434-41. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101346. Epub 2013 Mar 18. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23508208
-
Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision.J Med Ethics. 2014 Jul;40(7):463-70. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101614. J Med Ethics. 2014. PMID: 23955288
-
Circumcision rates in the United States: rising or falling? What effect might the new affirmative pediatric policy statement have?Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 May;89(5):677-86. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Apr 2. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014. PMID: 24702735 Review.
-
Neonatal circumcision: new recommendations & implications for practice.Mo Med. 2014 May-Jun;111(3):222-30. Mo Med. 2014. PMID: 25011345 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing Penile Problems in Circumcised vs. Uncircumcised Boys: Insights From a Large Commercial Claims Database With a Focus on Provider Type Performing Circumcision.J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Nov;59(11):161614. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.06.022. Epub 2024 Jul 5. J Pediatr Surg. 2024. PMID: 39084960
-
Neonatal Male Circumcision: Clearly Beneficial for Public Health or an Ethical Dilemma? A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2024 Feb 23;16(2):e54772. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54772. eCollection 2024 Feb. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38405642 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comments by opponents on the British Medical Association's guidance on non-therapeutic male circumcision of children seem one-sided and may undermine public health.World J Clin Pediatr. 2023 Dec 9;12(5):244-262. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v12.i5.244. eCollection 2023 Dec 9. World J Clin Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 38178933 Free PMC article.
-
Traditional male circumcision and the risk for HIV transmission among men: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2023 May 19;13(5):e072118. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072118. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37208134 Free PMC article.
-
A Case Report of Congenital Afibrinogenemia and Literature Review of Management of Post-circumcision Bleeding.Cureus. 2023 Mar 21;15(3):e36459. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36459. eCollection 2023 Mar. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 36950719 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
