Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Jan;28(1):107-13.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2192-4. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

Electronic health record impact on work burden in small, unaffiliated, community-based primary care practices

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Electronic health record impact on work burden in small, unaffiliated, community-based primary care practices

Jenna Howard et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The use of electronic health records (EHR) is widely recommended as a means to improve the quality, safety and efficiency of US healthcare. Relatively little is known, however, about how implementation and use of this technology affects the work of clinicians and support staff who provide primary health care in small, independent practices.

Objective: To study the impact of EHR use on clinician and staff work burden in small, community-based primary care practices.

Design: We conducted in-depth field research in seven community-based primary care practices. A team of field researchers spent 9-14 days over a 4-8 week period observing work in each practice, following patients through the practices, conducting interviews with key informants, and collecting documents and photographs. Field research data were coded and analyzed by a multidisciplinary research team, using a grounded theory approach.

Participants: All practice members and selected patients in seven community-based primary care practices in the Northeastern US.

Key results: The impact of EHR use on work burden differed for clinicians compared to support staff. EHR use reduced both clerical and clinical staff work burden by improving how they check in and room patients, how they chart their work, and how they communicate with both patients and providers. In contrast, EHR use reduced some clinician work (i.e., prescribing, some lab-related tasks, and communication within the office), while increasing other work (i.e., charting, chronic disease and preventive care tasks, and some lab-related tasks). Thoughtful implementation and strategic workflow redesign can mitigate the disproportionate EHR-related work burden for clinicians, as well as facilitate population-based care.

Conclusions: The complex needs of the primary care clinician should be understood and considered as the next iteration of EHR systems are developed and implemented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742–752. - PubMed
    1. Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:1103–1117. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apkon M, Singhaviranon P. Impact of an electronic information system on physician workflow and data collection in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(1):122–130. doi: 10.1007/s001340000777. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roukema J, Los R, Bleeker S, Ginneken A, Lei J, Moll H. Paper versus computer: feasibility of an electronic medical record in general pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2006;117:15–21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2741. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. . In: Medicine Io, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources