Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jan;20(1):110-4.
doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31825a27ab.

Oophorectomy: The Debate Between Ovarian Conservation and Elective Oophorectomy

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Oophorectomy: The Debate Between Ovarian Conservation and Elective Oophorectomy

Elisabeth A Erekson et al. Menopause. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Ovarian cancer remains the fifth deadliest cancer among women because of its early asymptomatic nature and lack of efficacious screening methods, leading to frequent late-stage diagnosis. Elective oophorectomy is an option for women undergoing benign hysterectomy as a means of reducing their ovarian cancer risk. Benefits also include reduced risk of repeat surgical operation due to adnexal masses and reduced anxiety related to perceived risk of ovarian and breast cancer. The potential negative side effects of elective oophorectomy, such as decreased cognition and sexual function and increased risk of osteoporosis and cardiac mortality, offer support for ovarian conservation. The implications of this elective procedure and the possible consequences without it require physicians to review the pros and cons with patients in light of the patient's individual circumstances and ovarian cancer risk.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

For the remaining authors none were declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 9 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Feedback