Re-challenge with pemetrexed in advanced mesothelioma: a multi-institutional experience

BMC Res Notes. 2012 Sep 3:5:482. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-482.

Abstract

Background: Although first-line therapy for patients affected by advanced mesothelioma is well established, there is a lack of data regarding the impact of second-line treatment.

Methods: We retrospectively collected data of patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, already treated with first-line therapy based on pemetrexed and platin, with a response (partial response or stable disease) lasting at least 6 months, and re-treated with a pemetrexed-based therapy at progression. The primary objective was to describe time to progression and overall survival after re-treatment.

Results: Overall across several Italian oncological Institutions we found 30 patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, in progression after a 6-month lasting clinical benefit following a first-line treatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed, and re-challenged with a pemetrexed-based therapy. In these patients we found a disease control rate of 66%, with reduction of pain in 43% of patients. Overall time to progression and survival were promising for a second-line setting of patients with advanced mesothelioma, being 5.1 and 13.6 months, respectively.

Conclusions: In our opinion, when a patient has a long-lasting benefit from previous treatment with pemetrexed combined with a platin compound, the same treatment should be offered at progression.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Glutamates / therapeutic use*
  • Guanine / analogs & derivatives*
  • Guanine / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mesothelioma / drug therapy*
  • Pemetrexed
  • Pleural Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Glutamates
  • Pemetrexed
  • Guanine