Improving the quality of surveys of physicians and medical groups: a research agenda
- PMID: 22947596
- DOI: 10.1177/0163278712458283
Improving the quality of surveys of physicians and medical groups: a research agenda
Abstract
Because health care providers have a central role in implementing guidelines, health care reform, and new standards of care and technologies, surveying them about their practices and perspectives is vital for health services and policy research. In November 2010, the National Cancer Institute convened a workshop to review and discuss current methodologies in designing and fielding large-scale surveys of physicians and medical groups. This report summarizes key issues and future directions for four topic areas addressed in the workshop: sample frames for surveying physicians and medical groups; points of contact and response modes; response incentives; and questionnaire design and burden. Recommendations were made for improving sample frame databases, optimizing mixed-mode surveys, and studying use of incentives with gatekeepers and in medical group settings. There is particular need for empirical assessment of factors that motivate or impede participation of physicians, other types of clinicians, and medical groups in survey research.
Similar articles
-
Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration.Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):352-81. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496630. Eval Health Prof. 2013. PMID: 23975760
-
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15520092
-
Sample frame and related sample design issues for surveys of physicians and physician practices.Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):296-329. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496566. Eval Health Prof. 2013. PMID: 23975759
-
Health care provider surveys in the United States, 2000-2010: a review.Eval Health Prof. 2013 Mar;36(1):106-26. doi: 10.1177/0163278712474001. Eval Health Prof. 2013. PMID: 23378504 Review.
-
Design strategies and innovations in the medical expenditure panel survey.Med Care. 2003 Jul;41(7 Suppl):III5-III12. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000076048.11549.71. Med Care. 2003. PMID: 12865722 Review.
Cited by
-
Differences between Doctors of Dental Medicine and Doctors of Medicine Awareness of Their Online Image and Perception Concerns: a Quantitative Cross-Sectional Study.Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024 Sep;58(3):291-304. doi: 10.15644/asc58/3/8. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024. PMID: 39492866 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring e-Professional Behavior of Doctors of Medicine and Dental Medicine on Social Networking Sites: Indexes Construction With Formative Indicators.JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Feb 27;10:e50156. doi: 10.2196/50156. JMIR Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38412021 Free PMC article.
-
Environmental management of asthma in clinical practice: Results from the 2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2023 Nov 22;3(1):100192. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2023.100192. eCollection 2024 Feb. J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2023. PMID: 38187868 Free PMC article.
-
A randomised controlled trial of email versus mailed invitation letter in a national longitudinal survey of physicians.PLoS One. 2023 Aug 22;18(8):e0289628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289628. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37607168 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Does a brief surgeon training in negotiation theory principles decrease rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy?Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 May;199(1):119-126. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06891-6. Epub 2023 Mar 7. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023. PMID: 36881270 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
