Assessment of teamwork during structured interdisciplinary rounds on medical units
- PMID: 22961774
- DOI: 10.1002/jhm.1970
Assessment of teamwork during structured interdisciplinary rounds on medical units
Abstract
Background: Interdisciplinary rounds (IDR) provide a means to assemble hospital team members and improve collaboration. Little is known about teamwork during IDR.
Objective: To evaluate and characterize teamwork during IDR.
Design: Cross-sectional observational study.
Setting: Six medical units which had implemented structured interdisciplinary rounds (SIDR).
Measurements: We adapted the Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS) tool, a behaviorally anchored rating scale shown to be reliable and valid in surgical settings. OTAS provides scores ranging from 0 to 6 (0 = problematic behavior; 6 = exemplary behavior) across 5 domains (communication, coordination, cooperation/backup behavior, leadership, and monitoring/situational awareness) and for prespecified subteams. Two researchers conducted direct observations using the adapted OTAS tool.
Results: We conducted 7-8 independent observations for each unit (total = 44) and 20 joint observations. Inter-rater reliability was excellent at the unit level (Spearman's rho = 0.75), and good across domains (rho = 0.53-0.68) and subteams (rho = 0.53-0.76) with the exception of the physician subteam, for which it was poor (rho = 0.35). Though teamwork scores were generally high, we found differences across units, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) 4.5 (3.9-4.9) for the lowest and 5.4 (5.3-5.5) for the highest performing unit (P < 0.01). Domain scores differed, with leadership receiving the lowest (median [IQR] = 5.0 [4.6-5.3]), and cooperation/backup behavior and monitoring/situational awareness receiving highest scores (median [IQR] = 5.4 [5.0-5.5] and 5.4 [5.0-5.7]). Differences across subteams were of borderline significance (P = 0.05).
Conclusions: The adapted OTAS instrument demonstrated acceptable reliability for assessing teamwork during SIDR across units, domains, and most subteams. Variation in performance suggests a need to improve consistency of teamwork and emphasizes the importance of leadership.
Copyright © 2012 Society of Hospital Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: feasibility of clinical and nonclinical assessor calibration with short-term training.Ann Surg. 2012 Apr;255(4):804-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824a9a02. Ann Surg. 2012. PMID: 22367446
-
Observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS): refinement and application in urological surgery.World J Surg. 2007 Jul;31(7):1373-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9053-z. World J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17487527
-
Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: construct validation with expert versus novice raters.Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):1047-51. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a50220. Ann Surg. 2009. PMID: 19474694
-
A scoping review of new implementations of interprofessional bedside rounding models to improve teamwork, care, and outcomes in hospitals.J Interprof Care. 2024 May-Jun;38(3):411-426. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1980379. Epub 2021 Oct 10. J Interprof Care. 2024. PMID: 34632913 Review.
-
[Interdisciplinary teamwork in the OR: Identification and measurement of teamwork in the operating room].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(5-6):293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jul 1. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014. PMID: 25066348 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Using a Sociogram to Characterize Communication During an Interprofessional Team Huddle.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Nov 17;13:1583-1593. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S273746. eCollection 2020. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020. PMID: 33244236 Free PMC article.
-
Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds, in-hospital deaths, and new nursing home placements among older inpatients.Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Nov 8;13:2289-2294. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S171508. eCollection 2018. Clin Interv Aging. 2018. PMID: 30519010 Free PMC article.
-
Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study.BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):15-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007292. Epub 2018 Feb 23. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019. PMID: 29475980 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative evaluation of geographical localization of hospitalists: how unintended consequences may impact quality.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29(7):1009-16. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2780-6. Epub 2014 Feb 19. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24549518 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
