Evaluation of the different strategies to oral cancer knowledge: a randomized controlled study

Psychooncology. 2013 Jul;22(7):1618-23. doi: 10.1002/pon.3189. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

Abstract

Objectives: Oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer has been well recognized as a public health problem. Prognosis for oral cancer is substantially improved when diagnosed early. A study was made of the impact of different educational strategies upon knowledge of oral cancer, evaluating the intervention after 4 weeks.

Methods: Ninety subjects over 40 years of age were consecutively included and randomized to three different groups (video, leaflet, verbal information). All subjects completed a 20-item pre-test on their knowledge of the risk factors, signs, and symptoms of oral cancer, and posteriorly received the video, leaflet, or verbal information, with evaluation of the results after 4 weeks.

Results: In relation to the items correctly answered at baseline, all subjects showed an increase in knowledge score after 4 weeks: verbal information 4.77 ± 3.31, leaflets 4.53 ± 3.44, and video 3.67 ± 3.31 - no statistically significant differences being observed for any of the three strategies.

Conclusion: The oral cancer knowledge score increased following the educational intervention, which proved successful over the short term.

Keywords: education; leaflet; oncology; oral cancer; video.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Health Education / methods*
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mouth Neoplasms*
  • Pamphlets
  • Program Evaluation / methods*
  • Regression Analysis
  • Risk Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Video Recording