Humeral head prosthetic arthroplasty: Surgically relevant geometric considerations

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1993 Nov;2(6):296-304. doi: 10.1016/1058-2746(93)90075-R. Epub 2009 Feb 25.

Abstract

The relationship of the humeral head prosthesis to the humerus is a critical determinant of the result in glenohumeral arthroplasty. With canal-fitting humeral prostheses, the position of the component is largely dictated by the location of the reamed medullary canal. This study explores the geometric relationships of a surgically defined humeral reference, the "orthopedic axis." This is the axis of a cylindric reamer or press-fit prosthetic stem inserted to the appropriate depth for the humeral prosthesis. The orthopedic axis provides a reference for measuring surgically important geometric features of the normal humeral articular surface and comparing them with those available with humeral prosthetic components. In 10 cadaveric proximal humeri, we measured the following seven parameters in a radiologic projection of the humerus on the plane transverse to the orthopedic axis: the surgically-determined reamed diameter of the humeral canal, the diameter of curvature of the humeral head articular surface, the effective humeral neck length, the combined head and neck length, the subtended angle of the humeral joint surface, the anterior/posterior offset of the center of the humeral head, and the biceps-articular surface angle. We then determined the prosthetic geometry of a canal-fitting humeral component necessary to match the stem size, head diameter, head and neck length, and effective humeral neck length. To examine the effect of changing component version, we determined the maximal angle of anteversion and retroversion achievable by rotation of the component about the orthopedic axis without compromising the tuberosities. In the maximal possible anteversion or retroversion, the combined head and neck length changed by only 2 mm. Thus the effect of component version of a press-fit prosthesis on glenohumeral soft-tissue tension is small. The study suggests that the surgeon controls relatively few important variables in a canal-fitting humeral arthroplasty. Kinematics of the arthroplasty are controlled primarily by soft-tissue releases and the selection of the prosthetic head-neck length.