Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep 6:6:59.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00059. eCollection 2012.

Blocking muscarinic receptors in the olfactory bulb impairs performance on an olfactory short-term memory task

Affiliations

Blocking muscarinic receptors in the olfactory bulb impairs performance on an olfactory short-term memory task

Sasha Devore et al. Front Behav Neurosci. .

Abstract

Cholinergic inputs to cortical processing networks have long been associated with attentional and top-down processing. Experimental and theoretical studies suggest that cholinergic inputs to the main olfactory bulb (OB) can modulate both neural and behavioral odor discrimination. Previous experiments from our laboratory and others demonstrate that blockade of nicotinic receptors directly impairs olfactory discrimination, whereas blockade of muscarinic receptors only measurably impairs olfactory perception when task demands are made more challenging, such as when very low-concentration odors are used or rats are required to maintain sensory memory over long durations. To further investigate the role of muscarinic signaling in the OB, we developed an olfactory delayed match-to-sample task using a digging-based behavioral paradigm. We find that rats are able to maintain robust short-term odor memory for 10-100 s. To investigate the role of muscarinic signaling in task performance, we bilaterally infused scopolamine into the OB. We find that high dosages of scopolamine (38 mM) impair performance on the task across all delays tested, including the baseline condition with no delay, whereas lower dosages (7.6 mM and 22.8 mM) had no measureable effects. These results indicate that general execution of the match-to-sample task, even with no delay, is at least partially dependent on muscarinic signaling in the OB.

Keywords: acetylcholine; delayed match-to-sample; olfaction; olfactory bulb; scopolamine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental setup for the delayed match-to-sample task. (A) At the start of a trial, the rat was presented with a ceramic dish containing odorized bedding. (B) After allowing for 10–15 s of investigation, the sample odor dish was removed and a delay period (ranging from 0 s to 10 min) was imposed. (C) At the end of the delay period, the divider was raised and the rat moved to the test chamber and had to discriminate between a dish containing the matching odor (rewarded) and one containing a non-matching odor (unrewarded). A trial was counted as correct if the rat initiated digging in the matching odor dish first.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histological verification of cannula placement. Coronal section through the OB illustrating placement of guide cannula and infusion needle. The arrowhead points to a cannula track in the right OB. Double headed arrow is 1 mm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Performance on the baseline delayed match-to-sample. Percent correct performance as a function of delay, averaged across subjects (n = 6). Error bars indicate ±1 SEM. Asterisks indicates significant differences of *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.001 from performance obtained with a 0 s delay (baseline memory test).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of blocking bulbar muscarinic receptors on delayed match-to-sample. Percent correct performance for the baseline (0 s delay) and short-term (120 s delay) memory tests after saline or scopolamine (7.6, 22.5, and 38 mM) infusion into the olfactory bulb. Error bars indicate ±1 SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences of *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.005 relative to saline controls.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Castillo P. E., Carleton A., Vincent J. D., Lledo P. M. (1999). Multiple and opposing roles of cholinergic transmission in the main olfactory bulb. J. Neurosci. 19, 9180–9191 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaudhury D., Escanilla O., Linster C. (2009). Bulbar acetylcholine enhances neural and perceptual odor discrimination. J. Neurosci. 29, 52–60 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4036-08.2009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cleland T. A., Linster C. (2005). Computation in the olfactory system. Chem. Senses 30, 801–813 10.1093/chemse/bji072 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cleland T. A., Morse A., Yue E., Linster C. (2002). Behavioral models of odor similarity. Behav. Neurosci. 116, 222–231 - PubMed
    1. David F. O., Hugues E., Cenier T., Fourcaud-Trocmé N., Buonviso N. (2009). Specific entrainment of mitral cells during gamma oscillation in the rat olfactory bulb. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5:e1000551 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000551 - DOI - PMC - PubMed