Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
, 9 (7), 582-91

Fluoroscopic Caudal Epidural Injections in Managing Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome: Two-Year Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Control Trial

Randomized Controlled Trial

Fluoroscopic Caudal Epidural Injections in Managing Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome: Two-Year Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Control Trial

Laxmaiah Manchikanti et al. Int J Med Sci.


Study design: A randomized, active control, double-blind trial.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of fluoroscopically directed caudal epidural injections with or without steroids in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain secondary to post lumbar surgery syndrome.

Summary of background data: There is a paucity of evidence concerning caudal epidural injections for managing chronic persistent low back pain with or without lower extremity pain caused by post lumbar surgery syndrome.

Methods: This active control randomized study included 140 patients with 70 patients in each group. Group I received 0.5% lidocaine, 10 mL; Group II received 9 mL of 0.5% lidocaine mixed with 1 mL of 6 mg of nonparticulate betamethasone. The multiple outcome measures included the numeric rating scale, the Oswestry Disability Index 2.0, employment status, and opioid intake with assessments at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months posttreatment. Primary outcome was defined as at least 50% improvement in pain and Oswestry Disability Index scores. Patients with a positive response to the first 2 procedures with at least 3 weeks of relief were considered to be successful. All others were considered as failures.

Results: Overall in Group I, 53% and 47% of the patients and in Group II, 59% and 58% of the patients, showed significant improvement with reduction in pain scores and disability index at 12 months and 24 months. In contrast, in the successful groups, significant pain relief and improvement in function were observed in 70% and 62% of Group I at one and 2 years; in 75% and 69% of Group II at one and 2 years. The results in the successful group showed that at the end of the first year patients experienced approximately 38 weeks of relief and at the end of 2 years Group I had 62 weeks and Group II had 68 weeks of relief. Overall total relief for 2 years was 48 weeks in Group I and 54 weeks in Group II. The average procedures in the successful groups were at 4 in one year and 6 at the end of 2 years.

Conclusion: Caudal epidural injections of local anesthetic with or without steroid might be effective in patients with chronic persistent low back and/or lower extremity pain in patients with post lumbar surgery syndrome.

Keywords: Chronic low back pain; caudal epidural steroid injections.; epidural fibrosis; post lumbar surgery syndrome; recurrent disc herniation; spinal stenosis.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.


Fig 1
Fig 1
Schematic presentation of patient flow at 2-year follow-up.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Proportion of patients with significant reduction in Numeric Rating Score and Oswestry Disability Index (≥ 50% reduction from baseline).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 12 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles


    1. Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F. et al. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24:769–81. - PubMed
    1. Martin BI, Turner JA, Mirza SK. et al. Trends in health care expenditures, utilization, and health status among US adults with spine problems, 1997-2006. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;24:2077–84. - PubMed
    1. Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Agans RP. et al. The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:251–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research, June 29, 2011. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Consensus Report;
    1. Manchikanti L, Fellows B, Ailinani H. et al. Therapeutic use, abuse, and nonmedical use of opioids: a ten-year perspective. Pain Physician. 2010;13:401–35. - PubMed

Publication types