Temporal trends, practice patterns, and treatment outcomes for infected upper urinary tract stones in the United States
- PMID: 23031677
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.035
Temporal trends, practice patterns, and treatment outcomes for infected upper urinary tract stones in the United States
Abstract
Background: The incidence of infected urolithiasis is unknown, and evidence describing the optimal management strategy for obstruction is equivocal.
Objective: To examine the trends of infected urolithiasis in the United States, the practice patterns of competing treatment modalities, and to compare adverse outcomes.
Design, setting, and participants: A weighted estimate of 396385 adult patients hospitalized with infected urolithiasis was extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1999-2009.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Time trend analysis examined the incidence of infected urolithiasis and associated sepsis, as well as rates of retrograde ureteral catheterization and percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) for urgent/emergent decompression. Propensity-score matching compared the rates of adverse outcomes between approaches.
Results and limitations: Between 1999 and 2009, the incidence of infected urolithiasis in women increased from 15.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.3-15.6) to 27.6 (27.4-27.8)/100 000); men increased from 7.8 (7.7-7.9) to 12.1 (12.0-12.3)/100000. Rates of associated sepsis increased from 6.9% to 8.5% (p=0.013), and severe sepsis increased from 1.7% to 3.2% (p<0.001); mortality rates remained stable at 0.25-0.20% (p=0.150). Among those undergoing immediate decompression, 113 459 (28.6%), PCN utilization decreased from 16.1% to 11.2% (p=0.001), with significant regional variability. In matched analysis, PCN showed higher rates of sepsis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.63; 95% CI, 1.52-1.74), severe sepsis (OR: 2.28; 95% CI, 2.06-2.52), prolonged length of stay (OR: 3.18; 95% CI, 3.01-3.34), elevated hospital charges (OR: 2.71; 95%CI, 2.57-2.85), and mortality (OR: 3.14; 95%CI, 13-4.63). However, observational data preclude the assessment of timing between outcome and intervention, and disease severity.
Conclusions: Between 1999 and 2009, women were twice as likely to have infected urolithiasis. Rates of associated sepsis and severe sepsis increased, but mortality rates remained stable. Analysis of competing treatment strategies for immediate decompression demonstrates decreasing utilization of PCN, which showed higher rates of adverse outcomes. These findings should be viewed as preliminary and hypothesis generating, demonstrating the pressing need for further study.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
How do we manage infected, obstructed hydronephrosis?Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):93-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Oct 16. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23084332 No abstract available.
-
Reply from authors re: Brian R. Matlaga. How do we manage infected, obstructed hydronephrosis? Eur Urol 2013;64:93-4: the infected upper urinary tract stone and obstruction: stent first where possible?Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):95-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.053. Epub 2012 Nov 8. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23159453 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
How do we manage infected, obstructed hydronephrosis?Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):93-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Oct 16. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23084332 No abstract available.
-
Reply from authors re: Brian R. Matlaga. How do we manage infected, obstructed hydronephrosis? Eur Urol 2013;64:93-4: the infected upper urinary tract stone and obstruction: stent first where possible?Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):95-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.053. Epub 2012 Nov 8. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23159453 No abstract available.
-
Urolithiasis and urinary tract infection among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a review of US emergency department visits between 2006 and 2009.Urology. 2015 Apr;85(4):764-70. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.011. Epub 2015 Feb 7. Urology. 2015. PMID: 25669736
-
Lessons from Literature: Nephrostomy Versus Double J Ureteral Catheterization in Patients with Obstructive Urolithiasis-Which Method Is Superior?J Endourol. 2019 Oct;33(10):777-786. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0309. Epub 2019 Aug 28. J Endourol. 2019. PMID: 31250680 Review.
-
High risk and low prevalence diseases: Infected urolithiasis.Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;75:137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.10.049. Epub 2023 Nov 3. Am J Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 37950981 Review.
Cited by
-
Bilateral ureteral stones; factors affecting treatment decision.Urolithiasis. 2024 May 23;52(1):76. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01573-4. Urolithiasis. 2024. PMID: 38780633
-
Efficacy of an Oral Solution Containing Five Herbal Extracts in the Treatment of Urolithiasis: A Randomized, Single-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.J Res Pharm Pract. 2024 Apr 30;12(3):96-103. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_11_24. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep. J Res Pharm Pract. 2024. PMID: 38716323 Free PMC article.
-
Risk relationship between inflammatory bowel disease and urolithiasis: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.PLoS One. 2024 Apr 9;19(4):e0301545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301545. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38593126 Free PMC article.
-
Ureteral stricture formation after endoscopic removal of obstructing stones: could it be predicted with well-assessed radiological parameters?Urolithiasis. 2024 Feb 19;52(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01530-1. Urolithiasis. 2024. PMID: 38372797
-
Retrograde ureteral catheterization under local anesthesia for emergency drainage in patients with infection and hydronephrosis secondary to ureteral calculi: Experience from a tertiary care hospital.Tzu Chi Med J. 2023 May 17;35(4):317-321. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_11_23. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec. Tzu Chi Med J. 2023. PMID: 38035064 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
