Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
- PMID: 23036895
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60989-1
Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
Abstract
Background: Implant survival after conventional total hip replacement (THR) is often poor in younger patients, so alternatives such as hip resurfacing, with various sizes to fit over the femoral head, have been explored. We assessed the survival of different sizes of metal-on-metal resurfacing in men and women, and compared this survival with those for conventional stemmed THRs.
Methods: We analysed the National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR) for primary THRs undertaken between 2003 and 2011. Our analysis involved multivariable flexible parametric survival models to estimate the covariate-adjusted cumulative incidence of revision adjusting for the competing risk of death.
Findings: The registry included 434,560 primary THRs, of which 31,932 were resurfacings. In women, resurfacing resulted in worse implant survival than did conventional THR irrespective of head size. Predicted 5-year revision rates in 55-year-old women were 8·3% (95% CI 7·2-9·7) with a 42 mm resurfacing head, 6·1% (5·3-7·0) with a 46 mm resurfacing head, and 1·5% (0·8-2·6) with a 28 mm cemented metal-on-polyethylene stemmed THR. In men with smaller femoral heads, resurfacing resulted in poor implant survival. Predicted 5-year revision rates in 55-year-old men were 4·1% (3·3-4·9) with a 46 mm resurfacing head, 2·6% (2·2-3·1) with a 54 mm resurfacing head, and 1·9% (1·5-2·4) with a 28 mm cemented metal-on-polyethylene stemmed THR. Of male resurfacing patients, only 23% (5085 of 22076) had head sizes of 54 mm or above.
Interpretation: Hip resurfacing only resulted in similar implant survivorship to other surgical options in men with large femoral heads, and inferior implant survivorship in other patients, particularly women. We recommend that resurfacing is not undertaken in women and that preoperative measurement is used to assess suitability in men. Before further new implant technology is introduced we need to learn the lessons from resurfacing and metal-on-metal bearings.
Funding: National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Osteoarthritis: Surgical options for hip OA: digging beneath the surface of implant survival.Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;8(11):631. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.186. Epub 2012 Oct 16. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012. PMID: 23070647 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales.Lancet. 2012 Mar 31;379(9822):1199-204. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60353-5. Epub 2012 Mar 13. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22417410
-
Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jun;94(6):746-54. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B6.29239. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012. PMID: 22628587
-
The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Dec;94(12):1611-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.30040. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012. PMID: 23188900
-
Metal-on-metal surface replacement: a triumph of hope over reason: affirms.Orthopedics. 2011 Sep 9;34(9):e439-41. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110714-21. Orthopedics. 2011. PMID: 21902124 Review.
-
The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Apr;92(4):469-76. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22967. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010. PMID: 20357319 Review.
Cited by
-
Blood Metal Ion Levels After Hip Resurfacing: A Comparison of 2 Different Implants.Arthroplast Today. 2024 Oct 30;30:101555. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101555. eCollection 2024 Dec. Arthroplast Today. 2024. PMID: 39539683 Free PMC article.
-
Revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements with dual-mobility bearings and acetabular component retention.Bone Jt Open. 2024 Jun 24;5(6):514-523. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.56.BJO-2023-0165.R1. Bone Jt Open. 2024. PMID: 38910515 Free PMC article.
-
Cobalt ions induce a cellular senescence secretory phenotype in human synovial fibroblast-like cells that may be an early event in the development of adverse local tissue reactions to hip implants.Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024 May 15;6(3):100490. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100490. eCollection 2024 Sep. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024. PMID: 38828014 Free PMC article.
-
Surgeon views regarding the adoption of a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice: systematic review.BJS Open. 2024 Jan 3;8(1):zrad141. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad141. BJS Open. 2024. PMID: 38266120 Free PMC article.
-
Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review of the Current Literature.Cureus. 2023 Nov 3;15(11):e48238. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48238. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37929272 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
