Randomized controlled trial of chlorhexidine dressing and highly adhesive dressing for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults
- PMID: 23043083
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201206-1038OC
Randomized controlled trial of chlorhexidine dressing and highly adhesive dressing for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults
Abstract
Rationale: Most vascular catheter-related infections (CRIs) occur extraluminally in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Chlorhexidine-impregnated and strongly adherent dressings may decrease catheter colonization and CRI rates.
Objectives: To determine if chlorhexidine-impregnated and strongly adherent dressings decrease catheter colonization and CRI rates.
Methods: In a 2:1:1 assessor-masked randomized trial in patients with vascular catheters inserted for an expected duration of 48 hours or more in 12 French ICUs, we compared chlorhexidine dressings, highly adhesive dressings, and standard dressings from May 2010 to July 2011. Coprimary endpoints were major CRI with or without catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) with chlorhexidine versus nonchlorhexidine dressings and catheter colonization rate with highly adhesive nonchlorhexidine versus standard nonchlorhexidine dressings. Catheter-colonization, CR-BSIs, and skin reactions were secondary endpoints.
Measurements and main results: A total of 1,879 patients (4,163 catheters and 34,339 catheter-days) were evaluated. With chlorhexidine dressings, the major-CRI rate was 67% lower (0.7 per 1,000 vs. 2.1 per 1,000 catheter-days; hazard ratio [HR], 0.328; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.174-0.619; P = 0.0006) and the CR-BSI rate 60% lower (0.5 per 1,000 vs. 1.3 per 1,000 catheter-days; HR, 0.402; 95% CI, 0.186-0.868; P = 0.02) than with nonchlorhexidine dressings; decreases were noted in catheter colonization and skin colonization rates at catheter removal. The contact dermatitis rate was 1.1% with and 0.29% without chlorhexidine. Highly adhesive dressings decreased the detachment rate to 64.3% versus 71.9% (P < 0.0001) and the number of dressings per catheter to two (one to four) versus three (one to five) (P < 0.0001) but increased skin colonization (P < 0.0001) and catheter colonization (HR, 1.650; 95% CI, 1.21-2.26; P = 0.0016) without influencing CRI or CR-BSI rates.
Conclusions: A large randomized trial demonstrated that chlorhexidine-gel-impregnated dressings decreased the CRI rate in patients in the ICU with intravascular catheters. Highly adhesive dressings decreased dressing detachment but increased skin and catheter colonization. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01189682).
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01189682.
Similar articles
-
Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and less frequent dressing changes for prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2009 Mar 25;301(12):1231-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.376. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19318651 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Oligon catheters and chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges with standard multilumen central venous catheters for prevention of associated colonization and infections in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study.Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):420-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f0d4b. Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 21926583 Clinical Trial.
-
Jugular versus femoral short-term catheterization and risk of infection in intensive care unit patients. Causal analysis of two randomized trials.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov 15;188(10):1232-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201303-0460OC. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 24127770 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing to prevent vascular and epidural catheter colonization and infection: a meta-analysis.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Aug;58(2):281-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl234. Epub 2006 Jun 6. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006. PMID: 16757502 Review.
-
Dressings and securement devices for central venous catheters (CVC).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 10;2015(9):CD010367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010367.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26358142 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Improving central venous catheter care with chlorhexidine gluconate dressings: evidence from a systematic review and Meta-analysis.J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Nov 1;43(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00672-7. J Health Popul Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39487464 Free PMC article.
-
Protect peripheral intravenous catheters: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a novel antimicrobial dressing for peripheral intravenous catheters (ProP trial).BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 16;14(7):e084313. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084313. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39013653 Free PMC article.
-
Insertion site and risk of peripheral intravenous catheter colonization and/or local infection: a post hoc analysis of the CLEAN 3 study including more than 800 catheters.Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Jun 5;13(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01414-4. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024. PMID: 38840171 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Dressings and securement devices to prevent complications for peripheral arterial catheters.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 23;5(5):CD013023. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013023.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38780138 Review.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Containing Dressings in Reducing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections, Hospital Stay, and Costs.Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231214751. doi: 10.1177/00469580231214751. Inquiry. 2023. PMID: 38037829 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
