Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Apr;17(2):143-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Oct 6.

Randomized Controlled Trials of Psychological and Pharmacological Treatments for Nightmares: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Randomized Controlled Trials of Psychological and Pharmacological Treatments for Nightmares: A Meta-Analysis

Aslak Wøien Augedal et al. Sleep Med Rev. .

Abstract

A meta-analysis of treatments for nightmares is reported. The studies were identified by database searches and by an inspection of relevant reference lists. The inclusion criteria were: nightmares as a target problem, studies published in English, use of a randomized controlled trials and reporting of nightmare-relevant outcomes. A total of 19 studies, published between 1978 and 2012 were identified, which included 1285 participants. Effect sizes were calculated as Cohen's d. A statistically significant improvement for all studies combined (d = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.33-0.60, fixed effects model; d = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.32-0.66, random effects model) and for psychological treatments alone (d = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.36-0.60, random) and for prazosin alone (d = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.03-0.96, random) was found. Individual therapy format yielded a higher effect size than a self-help format (p = 0.03). Minimal interventions (relaxation, recording) yielded lower overall effect size than studies offering more extensive interventions (p = 0.02). It is concluded that there are both psychological and pharmacological interventions which have documented effects for the treatment of nightmares.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 15 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback