Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
, 22 (5), 396-9

Single-port Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Single-port Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Akira Sasaki et al. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech.

Abstract

Purpose: We report the outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC).

Methods: Fifty-four patients (27 in each group) were randomized. A visual analog scale was used with a 10-point scale for an objective assessment of incisional pain and incisional cosmesis on postoperative days 1, 3, and 14.

Results: The mean operating time was significantly longer in the SPLC. The mean cosmesis scores on postoperative days 3 (9.7 vs. 8.9, P = 0.01) and 14 (9.9 vs. 9.2, P<0.01) were significantly greater in the SPLC group than in the MPLC group. The group's mean visual analog scale scores for incisional pain, and their requirements for analgesics, did not differ significantly.

Conclusions: Although SPLC takes longer than MPLC, experienced laparoscopic surgeons can perform SPLC safely with results comparable with those for MPLC. SPLC is superior to MPLC in terms of short-term cosmetic outcomes.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 14 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback