Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Dec;14(6):556-66.
doi: 10.1007/s11906-012-0314-3.

Blood pressure j-curve: current concepts

Affiliations
Review

Blood pressure j-curve: current concepts

Maciej Banach et al. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

The blood pressure (BP) J-curve debate started in 1979, and we still cannot definitively answer all the questions. However, available studies of antihypertensive treatment provide strong evidence for J-shaped relationships between both diastolic and systolic BP and main outcomes in the general population of hypertensive patients, as well as in high-risk populations, including subjects with coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular hypertrophy, and elderly patients. However, further studies are still necessary in order to clarify this issue. This is connected to the fact that most available studies were observational, and randomized trials did not have or lost their statistical power and were inconclusive. Perhaps only the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and Optimal Blood Pressure and Cholesterol Targets for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Hypertensives (ESH-CHL-SHOT) will be able to finally answer all the questions. According to the current state of knowledge, it seems reasonable to suggest lowering BP to values within the 130-139/80-85 mmHg range, possibly close to the lower values in this range, in all hypertensive patients and to be very careful with further BP level reductions, especially in high-risk hypertensive patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
J-curve in the (a) ONTARGET ([10] modified according to [32, 33]) and (b) TNT ([10] modified according to [37]) studies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2009;119:e21–e181. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191261. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banach M, Aronow WS. Hypertension therapy in the older adults-do we know the answers to all the questions? The status after publication of the ACCF/AHA 2011 expert consensus document on hypertension in the elderly. J Hum Hypertens 2012; DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2012.3. - PubMed
    1. Chockalingam A, Campbell NR, Fodor JG. Worldwide epidemic of hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2006;22:553–555. doi: 10.1016/S0828-282X(06)70275-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bielecka-Dabrowa A, Aronow WS, Rysz J, Banach M. The Rise and Fall of Hypertension: Lessons Learned from Eastern Europe. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2011;5:174–179. doi: 10.1007/s12170-010-0152-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barylski M, Małyszko J, Rysz J, Myśliwiec M, Banach M. Lipids, blood pressure, kidney—what was new in 2011? Arch Med Sci. 2011;7(6):1055–1066. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2011.26620. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances