Assessment of volar angulation and shortening in 5th metacarpal neck fractures: an inter- and intra-observer validity and reliability study

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013 Jul;38(6):658-66. doi: 10.1177/1753193412461582. Epub 2012 Oct 11.

Abstract

Four methods for measuring volar angulation in 5th metacarpal neck fractures were tested for validity and reliability. Mid-medullary canal measurement in the lateral view (method MC-90) has previously been proven valid in a cadaveric study, hence used as a reference to test validity of the latter three. These three yielded a significant different mean fracture angle compared with MC-90, with only minor enhancement in reliability. Therefore, none of these three methods is recommended as a better standard method than the MC-90, where reliability was found to be substantial (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.53-0.81). Two methods for measuring shortening in 5th metacarpal neck fractures were compared, and stipulation of shortening by drawing a line through the most distal point of the heads of the neighbouring 3rd and 4th metacarpals (method SH-Stip) is a simple method with excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81-0.96) for estimating shortening, requiring only radiological examination of the injured hand.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01139528.

Keywords: Angulation; fracture; metacarpal; neck; reliability; shortening.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Fractures, Bone / diagnostic imaging*
  • Humans
  • Linear Models
  • Metacarpal Bones / diagnostic imaging*
  • Metacarpal Bones / injuries*
  • Observer Variation
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Reproducibility of Results

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01139528