IVF versus ICSI for the fertilization of in-vitro matured human oocytes

Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Dec;25(6):603-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Aug 31.


Traditional dogma suggests that intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) should be performed to ensure successful oocyte fertilization in an in-vitro maturation (IVM) cycle. This study postulated that there would be no difference in the fertilization rate when ICSI was compared with IVF. This hypothesis was tested in a randomized trial of IVF versus ICSI in IVM. A total of 150 immature oocytes were collected in eight cycles of IVM for patients diagnosed with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Patients were primed with minimal FSH before transvaginal oocyte aspiration. Sibling oocytes were inseminated by 50% IVF and 50% ICSI. There was no significant difference in fertilization, useable or total blastocyst development between the two insemination technique groups. Clinical pregnancy results for combined fresh and cryopreserved transfers were identical between the two insemination techniques with a total of two fresh and five cryopreserved IVF-inseminated embryos resulting in three clinical pregnancies (42.9%) and five fresh and two cryopreserved ICSI-derived embryos resulting in three clinical pregnancies (42.9%). This research has shown IVF to be a legitimate fertilization technique for IVM oocytes in PCOS patients and provides a greater awareness of the use of a fertilization method previously not utilized with IVM. In-vitro maturation (IVM) is an alternative treatment method to traditional IVF. Due to the minimal use of stimulating hormones in this treatment, IVM has a lower risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, it can be used for fertility preservation in cancer patients and it is more cost conservative. Early research into the effects of IVM showed a hardening effect on the membrane surrounding the egg (the zona pellucida). It was initially believed that, to overcome this hardening in order to allow the egg to be fertilized, spermatozoa would need to be injected into the egg using intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Due to recent advances in hormonal stimulation protocols (FSH priming) and culture conditions, we postulated that, for patients suffering from polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), fertilization, embryo development and clinical pregnancy would not be superior in the injected oocytes compared with those inseminated by IVF. We found that by using the two insemination techniques on sibling oocytes from eight PCOS patients, there was no significant difference in fertilization, useable or total blastocyst development (day 5 or 6 embryos) and that clinical pregnancy results were identical. This research provides a greater awareness of a fertilization technique which is not normally utilized for IVM treatment, providing a less invasive, more cost-effective approach for the patient.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Blastocyst
  • Cohort Studies
  • Cryopreservation
  • Ectogenesis
  • Female
  • Fertilization in Vitro* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques*
  • Infertility, Female / etiology
  • Infertility, Female / therapy*
  • Polycystic Ovary Syndrome / physiopathology*
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Rate
  • Single Embryo Transfer
  • Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic* / adverse effects
  • Vitrification
  • Western Australia / epidemiology