Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey
- PMID: 23064274
- PMCID: PMC3480671
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826cbc0d
Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey
Abstract
Background: The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey enables patients to report their experiences with outpatient medical offices.
Objective: To evaluate the factor structure and reliability of the CAHPS Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) Adult Visit Survey.
Data source: Data from 21,318 patients receiving care in 450 clinical practice sites collected from March 2010 to December 2010 were analyzed from the CG-CAHPS Database.
Research design and participants: Individual level and multilevel confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine CAHPS survey responses at the patient and practice site levels. We also estimated internal consistency reliability and practice site level reliability. Correlations among multi-item composites and correlations between the composites and 2 global rating items were examined.
Measures: Scores on CG-CAHPS composites assessing Access to Care, Doctor Communication, Courteous/Helpful Staff, and 2 global ratings of whether one would Recommend their Doctor, and an Overall Doctor Rating.
Results: Analyses provide support for the hypothesized 3-factor model assessing Access to Care, Doctor Communication, and Courteous/Helpful Staff. In addition, the internal consistency reliabilities were ≥ 0.77 and practice site level reliabilities for sites with >4 clinicians were ≥ 0.75. All composites were positively and significantly correlated with the 2 global rating items, with Doctor Communication having the strongest relationship with the global ratings.
Conclusions: The CG-CAHPS Adult Visit Survey has acceptable psychometric properties at the individual level and practice site level. The analyses suggest that the survey items are measuring their intended concepts and yield reliable information.
Similar articles
-
How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review.J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024 Jul 16;11(2):88-96. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2056. eCollection 2024 Summer. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024. PMID: 39044849 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and psychometric properties of the Japanese Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician & Group Survey (CG-CAHPS).PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250843. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33909708 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 2.0 adult core survey.Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 1):1509-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00190.x. Health Serv Res. 2003. PMID: 14727785 Free PMC article.
-
Development and evaluation of the CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey for in-center hemodialysis patients.Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Nov;64(5):753-60. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 Jul 3. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014. PMID: 24998035 Free PMC article.
-
The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations.Health Technol Assess. 2012 Jul;16(30):i-xii, 1-509. doi: 10.3310/hta16300. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 22747798 Review.
Cited by
-
Online video versus face-to-face patient-surgeon consultation: a systematic review.Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov 5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11307-7. Online ahead of print. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 39500768 Review.
-
Associations of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Survey Scores with Interventions and Site, Provider, and Patient Factors: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.J Patient Exp. 2024 Oct 13;11:23743735241283204. doi: 10.1177/23743735241283204. eCollection 2024. J Patient Exp. 2024. PMID: 39403289 Free PMC article.
-
How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review.J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024 Jul 16;11(2):88-96. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2056. eCollection 2024 Summer. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024. PMID: 39044849 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Content validity of patient-reported measures evaluating experiences of the quality of transitions in healthcare settings-a scoping review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11298-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39039533 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient Surveys Are Used Most Often to Assess Health Care Innovations, Rigorous Methods Are Less Common.Am J Med Qual. 2024 Jul-Aug 01;39(4):188-196. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197. Epub 2024 Jul 8. Am J Med Qual. 2024. PMID: 38976453 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Solomon LS, Hays RD, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Psychometric properties of a group-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) instrument. Med Care. 2005;43:53–60. - PubMed
-
- Hays RD, Brown J, Brown L, et al. Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory Analyses of Multi-Item Scales Assessing Parents’ Perceptions of Their Children’s Dental Care. Med Care. 2006;44(Suppl 3):S60–S68. - PubMed
-
- Hays RD, Shaul JA, Williams V, et al. Psychometric Properties of the CAHPS™ 1.0 Survey Measures. Med Care. 1999;37(Suppl 3):MS22–MS31. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
