Improving organizational climate for quality and quality of care: does membership in a collaborative help?
- PMID: 23064280
- PMCID: PMC5428889
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826b1087
Improving organizational climate for quality and quality of care: does membership in a collaborative help?
Abstract
Background: The lack of quality-oriented organizational climates is partly responsible for deficiencies in patient-centered care and poor quality more broadly. To improve their quality-oriented climates, several organizations have joined quality improvement collaboratives. The effectiveness of this approach is unknown.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of collaborative membership on organizational climate for quality and service quality.
Subjects: Twenty-one clinics, 4 of which participated in a collaborative sponsored by the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement.
Research design: Pre-post design. Preassessments occurred 2 months before the collaborative began in January 2009. Postassessments of service quality and climate occurred about 6 months and 1 year, respectively, after the collaborative ended in January 2010. We surveyed clinic employees (eg, physicians, nurses, receptionists, etc.) about the organizational climate and patients about service quality.
Measures: Prioritization of quality care, high-quality staff relationships, and open communication as indicators of quality-oriented climate and timeliness of care, staff helpfulness, doctor-patient communication, rating of doctor, and willingness to recommend doctor's office as indicators of service quality.
Results: There was no significant effect of collaborative membership on quality-oriented climate and mixed effects on service quality. Doctors' ratings improved significantly more in intervention clinics than in control clinics, staff helpfulness improved less, and timeliness of care declined more. Ratings of doctor-patient communication and willingness to recommend doctor were not significantly different between intervention and comparison clinics.
Conclusion: Membership in the collaborative provided no significant advantage for improving quality-oriented climate and had equivocal effects on service quality.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
The relationship between voice climate and patients' experience of timely care in primary care clinics.Health Care Manage Rev. 2015 Apr-Jun;40(2):104-15. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000017. Health Care Manage Rev. 2015. PMID: 24589927 Free PMC article.
-
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447009
-
Association of organizational culture and climate with variation in the clinical outcomes of collaborative care for maternal depression in community health centers.Implement Res Pract. 2023 Oct 13;4:26334895231205891. doi: 10.1177/26334895231205891. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Implement Res Pract. 2023. PMID: 37936965 Free PMC article.
-
The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations.Health Technol Assess. 2012 Jul;16(30):i-xii, 1-509. doi: 10.3310/hta16300. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 22747798 Review.
-
Organizational climate and health care outcomes.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Nov;33(11 Suppl):45-56. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33112-7. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007. PMID: 18173165 Review.
Cited by
-
Associations of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Survey Scores with Interventions and Site, Provider, and Patient Factors: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.J Patient Exp. 2024 Oct 13;11:23743735241283204. doi: 10.1177/23743735241283204. eCollection 2024. J Patient Exp. 2024. PMID: 39403289 Free PMC article.
-
How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review.J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024 Jul 16;11(2):88-96. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2056. eCollection 2024 Summer. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024. PMID: 39044849 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Collaborative Learning Among Health Care Organizations to Improve Quality and Advance Racial Equity.Health Equity. 2023 Sep 13;7(1):525-532. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0098. eCollection 2023. Health Equity. 2023. PMID: 37731789 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in Perception of Healthcare Management between Patients and Professionals.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3842. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053842. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36900854 Free PMC article.
-
Institutional Factors Associated with Infection Prevention and Control Practices Globally during the Infectious Pandemics in Resource-Limited Settings.Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 27;10(11):1811. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10111811. Vaccines (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36366320 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
-
- Kenagy JW, Berwick DM, Shore MF. Service quality in health care. JAMA. 1999;281:661–665. - PubMed
-
- Lewis RC, Booms BH. The marketing aspects of service quality. In: Berry L, Shostack G, Upah G, editors. Emerging Perspectives on Service Marketing. Chicago, IL: American Marketing; 1983. pp. 99–107.
-
- Zeithmal VA, Parasuraman A, Berry L. Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. New York: The Free Press; 1990.
-
- Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J. T hrough the Patient’s Eyes: Understanding and Promoting Patient-centered Care. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1993.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
