An important feature of an ECG analysis program is its ability to provide reliable measurements under various operating conditions, e.g., on noise-free and noisy ECGs. Therefore, within the European cooperative project "Common Standards For Quantitative Electrocardiography" (CSE), the accuracy and stability of ECG measurements obtained by several computer programs has been compared. To investigate the stability of measurements two sets of 10 ECGs with and without seven different high- and low-frequency types of noise--altogether 160 electrocardiograms and 160 vectorcardiograms--have been analyzed by eight electrocardiographic and five vectorcardiographic computer programs. The stability of measurement was tested with respect to results obtained for the noise-free recordings. In a previous paper, the influence of noise on wave boundary recognition has been reported. In the present paper, the effect of noise on amplitude measurements and on problems of waveform definitions within the QRS complex are described. The results indicate that programs analyzing an averaged beat exhibit less variability than programs which measure every complex or a selected beat. Comparability and stability of measurements could be improved if a standardized procedure for amplitude references were to be introduced. In addition, the stability of QRS waveform labelling could be improved if waveforms' minimum amplitude and duration were to be validated against the noise level which itself should be determined by a standardized procedure.