Centralization of radical prostatectomy in the United States
- PMID: 23069384
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.012
Centralization of radical prostatectomy in the United States
Abstract
Purpose: Radical prostatectomy is a common treatment for organ confined prostate cancer and its use is increasing. We examined how the increased volume is being distributed and what hospital characteristics are associated with increasing volume.
Materials and methods: We identified all men age 40 to less than 80 years who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer from 2000 to 2008 in the NIS (Nationwide Inpatient Sample) (586,429). Ownership of a surgical robot was determined using the 2007 AHA (American Hospital Association) Annual Survey. The association between hospital radical prostatectomy volume and hospital characteristics, including ownership of a robot, was explored using multivariate linear regression.
Results: From 2000 to 2008 there was a 74% increase in the number of radical prostatectomies performed (p = 0.05) along with a 19% decrease in the number of hospitals performing radical prostatectomy (p <0.001), resulting in an increase in annual hospital radical prostatectomy volume (p = 0.009). Several hospital variables were associated with greater radical prostatectomy volume including teaching status, urban location, large bed size and ownership of a robot in 2007. On multivariate analysis the year, teaching status, large bed size, urban location and presence of a robot were associated with higher hospital radical prostatectomy volume.
Conclusions: Use of radical prostatectomy increased significantly between 2000 and 2008, most notably after 2005. The increase in radical prostatectomy resulted in centralization to select hospitals, particularly those in the top radical prostatectomy volume quartile and those investing in robotic technology. Our findings support the hypothesis that hospitals with the greatest volume increases are specialty centers already performing a high volume of radical prostatectomy procedures.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: the differential effect of regionalization, procedure volume and operative approach.J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.028. Epub 2012 Oct 22. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23085052
-
Hospital volume, utilization, costs and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2012 May;187(5):1632-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.071. Epub 2012 Mar 14. J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22425094
-
Factors associated with adoption of robotic surgical technology in US hospitals and relationship to radical prostatectomy procedure volume.Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5c8b8. Ann Surg. 2014. PMID: 23965894
-
Redefining and Contextualizing the Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Centralization of Care.J Urol. 2017 Jul;198(1):92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.067. Epub 2017 Jan 30. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28153509
-
The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2000 Mar;163(3):867-9. J Urol. 2000. PMID: 10687994
Cited by
-
Robotic-assisted surgery for prostatectomy - does the diffusion of robotic systems contribute to treatment centralization and influence patients' hospital choice?Health Econ Rev. 2023 May 10;13(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00444-9. Health Econ Rev. 2023. PMID: 37162648 Free PMC article.
-
The application of 3D bioprinting in urological diseases.Mater Today Bio. 2022 Aug 2;16:100388. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100388. eCollection 2022 Dec. Mater Today Bio. 2022. PMID: 35967737 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: The PROST-QA/RP2 Consortium.J Urol. 2022 Jan;207(1):127-136. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002176. Epub 2021 Aug 26. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 34433304 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy: a New York statewide analysis of early adoption and outcomes between 2009 and 2017.J Robot Surg. 2021 Aug;15(4):627-633. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01152-w. Epub 2020 Oct 3. J Robot Surg. 2021. PMID: 33009988
-
Robotic prostatectomy is associated with increased patient travel and treatment delay.Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 May-Jun;10(5-6):192-201. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3628. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016. PMID: 27713799 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
