Descriptive experiences and sexual vs. nurturant aspects of cuddling between adult romantic partners
- PMID: 23070529
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-012-0014-8
Descriptive experiences and sexual vs. nurturant aspects of cuddling between adult romantic partners
Abstract
Touch is a critical factor in intimate bonds between romantic partners. Although cuddling is a key expression of intimacy, it has received little empirical attention. Past research suggests that cuddling has some sexual aspects (e.g., it increases testosterone [T]), but there are theoretical reasons to expect cuddling to also involve nurturant intimacy (which should decrease T). In this article, we examined the phenomenon of partner cuddling to: (1) provide a descriptive examination; (2) determine if cuddling involved only nurturant intimacy or also sexual intimacy; and (3) test whether cuddling was perceived as nurturant but experienced as sexual. Via an online questionnaire, 514 participants (338 women) responded to quantitative and qualitative questions about cuddling with their romantic partners. Results suggested that cuddling occurred frequently and for relatively long durations, and was viewed very positively. Findings also showed that cuddling was perceived as nurturant and non-sexual but was experienced as at least somewhat sexual, which may explain why past research had found that cuddling increased T. Correlational analyses linked cuddling frequency and enjoyment positively with partnered sexual activities, but negatively with solitary sexuality. Results were discussed relative to evolutionary theories of distinct but overlapping neurobiological systems underlying pair bonding that involve sexual and nurturant intimacy.
Similar articles
-
"Let's (not) talk about that": bridging the past sexual experiences taboo to build healthy romantic relationships.J Sex Res. 2011 Jul;48(4):381-91. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2010.482215. J Sex Res. 2011. PMID: 20432132
-
Romantic relationships and sexual activities of the first generation of youth living with HIV since birth.AIDS Care. 2011 Apr;23(4):393-400. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.516332. AIDS Care. 2011. PMID: 21271400
-
Kissing, Cuddling, and Massage at Most Recent Sexual Event: Findings From a U.S. Nationally Representative Probability Sample.J Sex Marital Ther. 2019;45(2):159-172. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2018.1494648. Epub 2019 Jan 31. J Sex Marital Ther. 2019. PMID: 30040548
-
The Steroid/Peptide Theory of Social Bonds: integrating testosterone and peptide responses for classifying social behavioral contexts.Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Oct;36(9):1265-75. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 2. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011. PMID: 21724336 Review.
-
Intimacy and Smartphone Multitasking-A New Oxymoron?Psychol Rep. 2016 Dec;119(3):826-838. doi: 10.1177/0033294116662658. Epub 2016 Aug 5. Psychol Rep. 2016. PMID: 27495939 Review.
Cited by
-
Debunking Lesbian Bed Death: Using Coarsened Exact Matching to Compare Sexual Practices and Satisfaction of Lesbian and Heterosexual Women.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Nov;50(8):3601-3619. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02096-4. Epub 2021 Nov 1. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 34725751
-
Securing Your Relationship: Quality of Intimate Relationships During the COVID-19 Pandemic Can Be Predicted by Attachment Style.Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 21;12:647956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647956. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34366966 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived Partner Responsiveness Forecasts Behavioral Intimacy as Measured by Affectionate Touch.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Feb;48(2):203-221. doi: 10.1177/0146167221993349. Epub 2021 Mar 19. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022. PMID: 33736544 Free PMC article.
-
How the brain codes intimacy: The neurobiological substrates of romantic touch.Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Sep;38(9):4525-4534. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23679. Epub 2017 Jun 5. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017. PMID: 28580708 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
