Does cognitive function predict frequency compressed speech recognition in listeners with normal hearing and normal cognition?

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jan;52(1):14-22. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.721013. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to investigate the relationship between cognitive ability and frequency compressed speech recognition in listeners with normal hearing and normal cognition.

Design: Speech-in-noise recognition was measured using Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers sentences presented over earphones at 65 dB SPL and a range of signal-to-noise ratios. There were three conditions: unprocessed, and at frequency compression ratios of 2:1 and 3:1 (cut-off frequency, 1.6 kHz). Working memory and cognitive ability were measured using the reading span test and the trail making test, respectively.

Study sample: Participants were 15 young normally-hearing adults with normal cognition.

Results: There was a statistically significant reduction in mean speech recognition from around 80% when unprocessed to 40% for 2:1 compression and 30% for 3:1 compression. There was a statistically significant relationship between speech recognition and cognition for the unprocessed condition but not for the frequency-compressed conditions.

Conclusions: The relationship between cognitive functioning and recognition of frequency compressed speech-in-noise was not statistically significant. The findings may have been different if the participants had been provided with training and/or time to 'acclimatize' to the frequency-compressed conditions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acoustic Stimulation
  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Audiometry, Speech
  • Cognition*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Memory
  • Noise / adverse effects
  • Perceptual Masking
  • Recognition, Psychology*
  • Signal Detection, Psychological
  • Speech Perception*
  • Trail Making Test